Paloalto Networks PSE-SWFW-Pro-24 Exam Dumps Questions and Answers

Cloud-native load balancing with Palo Alto Networks firewalls in public clouds involves understanding the distinct approaches for VM-Series and Cloud NGFW:

A. Cloud NGFW’s distributed architecture model requires deployment of a single centralized firewall and will force all traffic to the firewall across pre-built VPN tunnels: This is incorrect. Cloud NGFW uses a distributed architecture where traffic is steered to the nearest Cloud NGFW instance, often using Gateway Load Balancers (GWLBs) or similar services. It does not rely on a single centralized firewall or force all traffic through VPN tunnels.

B. VM-Series firewall deployments in the public cloud will require the deployment of a cloud-native load balancer if high availability (HA) or redundancy is needed: This is correct. VM-Series firewalls, when deployed for HA or redundancy, require a cloud-native load balancer (e.g., AWS ALB/NLB/GWLB, Azure Load Balancer) to distribute traffic across the active firewall instances. This ensures that if one firewall fails, traffic is automatically directed to a healthy instance.

C. Cloud NGFW in AWS or Azure has load balancing built into the underlying solution and does not require the deployment of a separate load balancer: This is also correct. Cloud NGFW integrates with cloud-native load balancing services (e.g., Gateway Load Balancer in AWS) as part of its architecture. This provides automatic scaling and high availability without requiring you to manage a separate load balancer.

D. VM-Series firewall load balancing is automated and is handled by the internal mechanics of the NGFW software without the need for a load balancer: This is incorrect. VM-Series firewalls do not have built-in load balancing capabilities for HA. A cloud-native load balancer is essential for distributing traffic and ensuring redundancy.

References:

Cloud NGFW documentation: Look for sections on architecture, traffic steering, and integration with cloud-native load balancing services (like AWS Gateway Load Balancer).

VM-Series deployment guides for each cloud provider: These guides explain how to deploy VM-Series firewalls for HA using cloud-native load balancers.

These resources confirm that VM-Series requires external load balancers for HA, while Cloud NGFW has load balancing integrated into its design.

This question asks about common characteristics of Cloud NGFW (specifically referring to Cloud NGFW for AWS and Azure) and VM-Series firewalls.

B. In Azure and AWS, both offerings can be managed by Panorama. This is correct. Panorama is the centralized management platform for Palo Alto Networks firewalls, including both VM-Series and Cloud NGFW deployments in AWS and Azure. Panorama allows for consistent policy management, logging, and reporting across these different deployment models.  

D. In Azure, inbound destination NAT configuration also requires source NAT to maintain flow symmetry. This is accurate specifically within the Azure environment. Due to how Azure networking functions, when performing destination NAT (DNAT) for inbound traffic to resources behind a firewall (whether VM-Series or Cloud NGFW), it's typically necessary to also implement source NAT (SNAT) to ensure return traffic follows the same path. This maintains flow symmetry and prevents routing issues. This is an Azure networking characteristic, not specific to the Palo Alto offerings themselves, but it applies to both in Azure.  

E. In Azure and AWS, internal (east-west) flows can be inspected without any NAT. This is generally true. For traffic within the same Virtual Network (Azure) or VPC (AWS), both VM-Series and Cloud NGFW can inspect traffic without requiring NAT. This is a key advantage for microsegmentation and internal security. The firewalls can act as transparent security gateways for internal traffic.

Why other options are incorrect:

A. In Azure, both offerings can be integrated directly into Virtual WAN hubs. While VM-Series firewalls can be integrated into Azure Virtual WAN hubs as secured virtual hubs, Cloud NGFW for Azure is not directly integrated into Virtual WAN hubs in the same way. Cloud NGFW for Azure uses a different architecture, deploying as a service within a virtual network.  

C. In AWS, both offerings can be managed by AWS Firewall Manager. AWS Firewall Manager is a service for managing AWS WAF, AWS Shield, and network firewalls (AWS Network Firewall). While AWS Firewall Manager can be used to manage AWS Network Firewall, it is not the management plane for Palo Alto Networks VM-Series or Cloud NGFW for AWS. These are managed by Panorama.  

Palo Alto Networks References:

To validate these points, refer to the following documentation areas on the Palo Alto Networks support site (live.paloaltonetworks.com):

Panorama Administrator's Guide: This guide details the management capabilities of Panorama, including managing VM-Series and Cloud NGFW deployments in AWS and Azure.  

Cloud NGFW for AWS/Azure Documentation: This documentation outlines the architecture and deployment models of Cloud NGFW, including its management and integration with cloud platforms.

VM-Series Deployment Guides for AWS/Azure: These guides describe the deployment and configuration of VM-Series firewalls in AWS and Azure, including networking considerations and integration with cloud services.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Step-by-Step Explanation:The customer’s AWS environment, with multiple VPCs protected by a cloud-native firewall, experienced a breach due to malware spreading across VPCs, indicating inadequate segmentation and visibility. The Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Software Firewall documentation provides guidance on securing multi-VPC AWS environments with Cloud NGFW, focusing on preventing lateral movement and enhancing threat prevention.

Implement a Cloud NGFW for each VPC (Option D): Deploying a Cloud NGFW instance in each VPC ensures localized traffic inspection, segmentation, and control, preventing malware from spreading laterally across VPCs. Cloud NGFW for AWS supports a distributed deployment model, allowing each VPC to have its own firewall instance integrated with AWS services (e.g., VPC routing, Security Groups) to enforce policies, block threats, and maintain visibility. The documentation recommends this approach for multi-VPC environments to minimize risk exposure and ensure granular security, addressing the customer’s breach scenario by isolating and securing each VPC independently.

Options A (Purchase a software credit pool for flexible Cloud NGFW deployment across the VPCs), B (Deploy a single Cloud NGFW), and C (Subscribe to Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Protection for the cloud-native firewall) are incorrect. A software credit pool (Option A) is a licensing mechanism, not a deployment solution, and does not address the need for multiple VPC protection. A single Cloud NGFW (Option B) cannot effectively secure multiple VPCs without introducing latency or complexity (e.g., centralized routing), failing to prevent lateral movement as seen in the breach. Advanced Threat Protection (Option C) enhances threat detection but does not resolve the segmentation issue; it requires a distributed deployment (like Option D) to prevent malware spread across VPCs.

References: Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Software Firewall, Section: Cloud NGFW for AWS Deployment, Multi-VPC Security Architecture, Advanced Threat Prevention Documentation.