Financial-Management WGU Financial Management VBC1 Questions and Answers

Under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act, senior executives—specifically the CEO and CFO—are required to certify that the company’s financial statements fairly present the firm’s financial condition and results of operations. This requirement increases executive accountability and ensures that financial reporting integrity is taken seriously at the highest level of management. False certification can result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Financial management texts emphasize that this provision aligns executive incentives with shareholder interests by making leaders directly responsible for financial transparency and accuracy. Option C correctly states this executive requirement.

Receivables turnover measures how efficiently a firm collects cash from its credit customers. It is calculated as Credit Sales ÷ Average Accounts Receivable and indicates how many times receivables are collected during the period. A higher receivables turnover ratio suggests faster collection, improved liquidity, and lower risk of bad debts. Effective receivables management reduces the firm’s need for external financing and supports smoother cash flows. Financial managers closely monitor this ratio to evaluate credit policies and collection efficiency. Option B correctly identifies the ratio designed specifically to assess receivables conversion into cash.

Tax expense reported on the income statement is calculated using accrual accounting, which recognizes revenues and expenses when they are earned or incurred, not necessarily when cash is paid. In contrast, actual taxes paid are based on tax laws and cash payments made to tax authorities. Differences arise due to temporary and permanent timing differences between financial reporting rules and tax regulations. Examples include depreciation methods, revenue recognition timing, loss carryforwards, and deferred tax assets or liabilities. These differences cause tax expense to diverge from cash taxes paid in a given period. Financial managers and analysts must understand this distinction to accurately assess cash flows, particularly when forecasting free cash flow or valuing firms. Option A correctly explains this discrepancy, whereas the other options either deny the existence of differences or incorrectly characterize tax expense accounting.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is the primary federal regulator of U.S. securities markets, but it works closely with self-regulatory organizations to oversee market participants. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is the main self-regulatory organization responsible for supervising broker-dealers, enforcing rules, and protecting investors. FINRA operates under SEC oversight, creating a layered regulatory framework that combines government authority with industry-specific expertise. This collaboration enhances market integrity and investor protection. Option C correctly identifies FINRA as the SEC’s primary partner in broker-dealer oversight.

Maintaining a cash reserve is a core element of prudent working capital management. Firms hold cash to meet transaction needs, precautionary needs, and sometimes speculative opportunities. The precautionary motive is particularly important, as it allows firms to handle unexpected expenses, revenue shortfalls, or economic disruptions without relying on costly external financing. Adequate liquidity reduces the risk of financial distress and enhances operational flexibility. Financial management theory emphasizes balancing the opportunity cost of holding cash against the benefits of liquidity. Option C accurately reflects this precautionary and liquidity-focused rationale.

Asset tangibility refers to the proportion of a firm’s assets that are physical and can be used as collateral, such as property, plant, and equipment. Firms with high asset tangibility typically have greater borrowing capacity because tangible assets reduce lender risk by providing collateral in case of default. This allows firms to secure debt financing at lower interest rates and with more favorable terms. Capital structure theory recognizes asset tangibility as a key determinant of leverage, particularly under the trade-off theory of capital structure. Option A accurately reflects the standard financial management view.

In a competitive bond sale, the issuer invites multiple underwriters (often investment banks) to bid on underwriting the bond issue. Each underwriting group proposes terms—commonly including the interest cost to the issuer (true interest cost or net interest cost), pricing, and underwriting spread. The issuer then selects the bid that provides the most favorable overall financing terms, typically the lowest borrowing cost for the desired structure and risk profile. This process is designed to create market competition among underwriters, which can reduce underwriting costs and improve pricing efficiency—especially when the issuer is well-known and the bond issue is relatively standard. This differs from a negotiated sale (option A), where the issuer works directly with a chosen underwriter to set terms through discussion rather than competitive bidding. Option C describes how an issuer might choose firms to participate, but it is not the defining mechanism of a competitive sale. Option D is incorrect because governments do not set fixed rates for corporate bond underwriting; pricing is determined by market conditions, issuer credit risk, investor demand, and the competitive bidding process itself.

The Gordon growth model estimates the cost of common equity based on dividends, assuming dividends grow at a constant rate indefinitely. While the model is simple and intuitive, its main drawback is that it can only be applied to firms that pay dividends and have stable, predictable growth rates. Many firms—especially young, high-growth, or technology companies—either do not pay dividends or experience volatile growth, making the model inappropriate for them. Additionally, small changes in the growth rate assumption can lead to large changes in estimated equity cost, increasing sensitivity and potential estimation error. Financial management texts emphasize that while the Gordon growth model is useful for mature, dividend-paying firms, it lacks flexibility across industries and life-cycle stages. Option D correctly identifies this key limitation.

The sustainable growth rate (SGR) represents the maximum rate at which a firm can grow its sales, assets, and earnings without raising new external equity. It is calculated as ROE × retention ratio, where the retention ratio equals one minus the dividend payout ratio. When a firm increases its dividend payout ratio, it retains less earnings for reinvestment, thereby reducing internally generated equity growth. Unless return on equity increases enough to offset this reduction—which is not assumed here—the sustainable growth rate will decline. Financial management theory emphasizes the trade-off between paying dividends and reinvesting earnings to support future growth. Option C correctly reflects this fundamental relationship between dividend policy and sustainable growth.

Beta measures a stock’s sensitivity to movements in the overall market and represents its level of systematic (non-diversifiable) risk. A beta greater than 1.0 indicates that the stock tends to move more than the market in response to market-wide changes. For example, if the market increases by 1%, a stock with a beta of 1.2 is expected, on average, to increase by approximately 1.2%. Conversely, it would also decline more sharply during market downturns. From a capital market theory perspective, higher beta implies higher risk and therefore a higher required rate of return to compensate investors. Financial managers use beta in the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) to estimate the cost of equity. Option B correctly describes the implication of a beta greater than one.

The Gordon growth model values a stock assuming dividends grow at a constant rate indefinitely. The formula is:

Stock Value = D₁ ÷ (r − g),

where D₁ is the expected dividend next year, r is the required rate of return, and g is the growth rate. Substituting the values:

$2 ÷ (0.10 − 0.05) = $2 ÷ 0.05 = $40.

This model is widely used in valuation for mature companies with stable dividend growth. It highlights the sensitivity of stock value to growth expectations and required returns. Option C correctly applies the Gordon growth model formula.

Dividend yield measures the cash return an investor receives relative to the stock’s current market price. It is calculated as Annual Dividend ÷ Market Price per Share. In this case, the dividend yield is $4 ÷ $80 = 0.05, or 5%. Dividend yield is a key valuation metric, particularly for income-oriented investors, as it indicates the immediate cash return from holding the stock, excluding capital gains. Financial managers monitor dividend yield to understand how dividend policy affects investor appeal and market valuation. Option B correctly reflects this calculation and interpretation.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is a self-regulatory organization responsible for overseeing brokerage firms and registered securities representatives in the United States. Its primary mission is to protect investors and ensure market integrity by enforcing rules governing ethical conduct, disclosure, trading practices, and licensing. FINRA operates under the oversight of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), creating a regulatory structure that combines federal authority with industry expertise. Unlike the FDIC, FINRA does not insure deposits, and unlike the Federal Reserve, it does not manage monetary policy or issue currency. Financial management texts emphasize FINRA’s role in supervising broker-dealers, administering qualification exams, and resolving disputes through arbitration and mediation. Option A correctly identifies FINRA’s core responsibility.

This question applies dividend-based stock valuation principles commonly covered under the Dividend Discount Model (DDM). The intrinsic value of a stock is determined by discounting expected future dividends at the investor’s required rate of return. When dividends are expected to grow at a constant rate, financial management texts recommend using the Gordon Growth Model, which states that stock value equals the next expected dividend divided by the difference between the required return and the growth rate. The calculated value of $66.55 reflects the present value of expected future dividends based on the assumptions provided in the problem. This valuation technique is widely used for mature, dividend-paying firms with stable growth. The result represents the theoretical fair value of the stock, which investors compare to the current market price to assess whether the stock is undervalued or overvalued.