PMI-PBA PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) Questions and Answers

Functional specifications are a type of requirements documentation that describes what the system or product should do in terms of functions, features, behaviors, inputs, outputs, etc. Functional specifications can help the business analyst to document the requirements in a way that is clearly understood by the development team and provides enough information to check if the requirement has been met. Functional specifications can also include acceptance criteria, test cases, data models, user interface designs, etc. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 39.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, one of the tasks under the domain of Traceability and Monitoring is to “Track the status, priority, and disposition of requirements and issues, and communicate updates as necessary” (Task 1). This implies that the business analyst is responsible for ensuring that the requirements are delivered as stated and that any changes or issues are communicated to the relevant stakeholders. One of the techniques that can be used to perform this task is the traceability matrix, which is a table that shows the relationships between requirements and other project artifacts, such as design documents, test cases, or deliverables. A traceability matrix can help the business analyst to verify that all the requirements are covered by the test cases and that the test output matches the expected results. Therefore, the technique that the business analyst could have used to ensure that requirements were delivered as stated is the traceability matrix.

 The requirements baseline is a document that contains the approved and validated requirements that are used as the basis for developing the solution. The requirements baseline defines the scope and boundaries of the product development, as it specifies what the product must do, what features and functions it must have, and what criteria it must meet to satisfy the stakeholders’ needs and expectations. The requirements baseline also serves as a reference point for measuring the progress and performance of the product development, as well as for managing changes and resolving issues. The requirements baseline is established after the requirements have been elicited, analyzed, prioritized, and verified by the business analyst and the stakeholders, and it is formally approved by the project sponsor or other authorized person. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

A functional requirement is a requirement that specifies what the system should do or how it should behave under certain conditions. A functional requirement describes the functionality, behavior, or performance of the system. An example of a functional requirement is the system is able to require passwords, which defines a security feature of the system that prevents unauthorized access. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

The best practice in product validation is that the evaluation criteria should be the same as what was used to measure the requirement. Product validation is a process that confirms that the product meets the stakeholder needs and expectations and delivers value to them. Product validation involves testing and verifying the product against predefined criteria and standards that reflect the requirements. The evaluation criteria should be consistent with what was used to measure the requirement during analysis, as this ensures that there is no discrepancy or deviation between what was specified and what was delivered. The measurement of the requirement should not be based on the average of two or more evaluations, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Averaging two or more evaluations may result in inaccurate or misleading results, as it may mask or dilute any errors, defects, or variations in the product quality or performance. Averaging two or more evaluations may also introduce bias or subjectivity into the validation process, as different evaluators may have different methods, tools, or perspectives for measuring the product. There should not be two separate measurements for evaluating each functional requirement, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two separate measurements may create confusion or inconsistency in the validation process, as it may lead to conflicting or contradictory results, depending on how each measurement is defined, performed, or interpreted. Having two separate measurements may also increase complexity or redundancy in the validation process, as it may require more time, effort, or resources to conduct and compare each measurement. Two or more testers should not test the product using the same test cases so that their evaluations are consistent, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may result in duplication or inefficiency in the validation process, as it may waste time, effort, or resources to perform identical tests without adding any value or information. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may also reduce effectiveness or reliability in the validation process, as it may overlook or ignore any errors, defects, or variations that are not covered by those test cases. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17-18.

Verification is the process of ensuring that the requirements meet a quality checklist and conform to the specified standards, rules, and criteria. Verification can help the business analyst to ensure that all requirements meet a quality checklist before the development and testing phase by checking the completeness, correctness, clarity, consistency, and testability of each requirement. Verification can also help to identify and resolve any defects, errors, or ambiguities in the requirements. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

 Observation is a technique that involves watching how people perform their tasks and activities in their natural work environment. Observation can be used to gain an objective, first-hand insight into tasks and activities that are difficult to describe, as it allows the business analyst to see the actual behavior, interactions, processes, and problems of the users or customers. Observation can also help to identify the implicit, hidden, or unspoken needs and expectations of the users or customers, as well as to validate the information obtained from other elicitation techniques. Observation can be done in two ways: passive or active. Passive observation means that the business analyst does not interfere or participate in the tasks and activities, but only records and analyzes what is observed. Active observation means that the business analyst interacts with the users or customers, asks questions, and provides feedback during the observation. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 89.

 According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a requirements traceability matrix is a tool that helps to ensure that the requirements are aligned with the business needs and objectives, and that they are verified and validated throughout the project life cycle. A requirements traceability matrix can also help to identify gaps, redundancies, and inconsistencies in the requirements. If the requirements matrix did not adequately track back to client requirements, it could result in a product that does not meet the client’s expectations or specifications, even if it passes the test plan. Therefore, it is important to establish and maintain a clear and accurate traceability of requirements from their source to their implementation and verification. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 179-180.

Decision trees, weighted matrix, and context diagrams are tools and techniques that can help the business analyst to maximize business value while establishing the requirements baseline. Decision trees are graphical representations of possible outcomes and choices based on certain conditions or criteria. Decision trees can help to evaluate and select the best option among multiple alternatives based on their expected value or risk. Weighted matrix are tables that assign scores and weights to different factors or measures to compare and prioritize them. Weighted matrix can help to rank the requirements based on their alignment with the business objectives, benefits, costs, risks, dependencies, urgency, etc. Context diagrams are visual models that show the boundaries and interactions of a system or product with its environment. Context diagrams can help to define the scope and stakeholders of a project, as well as their needs and expectations. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11-12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 66-69.

Requirements baseline is the approved version of the requirements document that serves as a reference point for further changes. Requirements can be changed after they are baselined through a defined process that involves submitting a change request, analyzing the impact of the change, obtaining approval from the stakeholders, updating the requirements document, and communicating the change to the project team and other affected parties. Requirements can be changed at any stage of the project life cycle as long as they follow the defined process. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

Business rules are statements that define or constrain some aspect of the business, such as policies, standards, procedures, regulations, or constraints. Business rules can be uncovered by asking about the reasons for choosing a particular course of action when modeling processes or analyzing tasks. By asking why a certain decision is made, what criteria are used, what conditions are applied, or what consequences are expected, the business analyst can elicit the business rules that govern the behavior or outcome of the process or task. Asking about tasks that overlap with each other, work that may be performed out of sequence, or task transitions that hinder organizational performance may help to identify issues or opportunities for improvement in the process or task, but they may not reveal the business rules that underlie them. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 95.

Interface modeling is a technique to describe how different components or systems interact with each other and exchange information. Interface modeling can be used to depict how the solution will work with all of the company’s systems by showing the inputs, outputs, and dependencies of each system. Interface modeling can help to identify potential integration issues, gaps, and conflicts among the systems. The other techniques are not suitable for this purpose. Data modeling is a technique to define the structure, format, and relationships of data. Rules modeling is a technique to define the logic, constraints, and policies that govern the behavior of the solution. Enterprise modeling is a technique to describe the structure, culture, and processes of an organization. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 11; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 54.

A configuration management system is a tool that can be used to trace the large number of requirements that will be generated by this project. A configuration management system is a system that consists of the processes, procedures, tools, and databases that are used to manage and control the configuration items of the project. A configuration item is any component of the project that has a defined and approved version, such as a requirement, a deliverable, a document, a model, a test case, etc. A configuration management system can help the business analyst and the project team to record, track, update, and maintain the configuration items throughout the project lifecycle, and to ensure their consistency, integrity, and traceability. A configuration management system can also help to handle changes, resolve issues, and measure the quality and performance of the project. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 133.

An interview is a technique that involves a structured or unstructured conversation between the business analyst and one or more stakeholders to elicit information, opinions, or feedback about a topic. An interview can be conducted face-to-face, over the phone, or through other communication channels. An interview can be prepared in advance with a list of questions or topics to cover, or it can be spontaneous and flexible. An interview can be used to explore the needs, expectations, preferences, or concerns of the stakeholders, as well as to clarify, verify, or validate the requirements. An interview is suitable for a project involving a low number of stakeholders, as it allows the business analyst to establish rapport, ask probing questions, and obtain detailed and specific information from each stakeholder. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 89.

 The type of requirements that do not trace to a business need are out-of-scope requirements. Out-of-scope requirements are the requirements that are not related to the project scope, objectives, or deliverables, and that do not contribute to the solution of the business problem or opportunity. Out-of-scope requirements are usually identified and excluded during the requirements analysis and traceability processes, to avoid wasting time, resources, and effort on unnecessary or irrelevant features or functions. Out-of-scope requirements can be caused by various factors, such as unclear or changing business needs, conflicting or unrealistic stakeholder expectations, poor communication or elicitation techniques, or lack of validation or verification methods. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

The purpose of reviewing the system use cases and screen mockups with the client team is to validate that the system is aligned with the stakeholder requirements. Validation is a process of ensuring that the solution meets the needs and expectations of the stakeholders and delivers value to them. Validation involves checking whether the solution is feasible, acceptable, complete, correct, consistent, and testable. By walking through the artifacts with the client team, the business analyst can obtain feedback, confirm understanding, identify gaps or errors, and resolve issues. Verifying that the documents are aligned with the transition requirements or the solution requirements are possible outcomes of the review meeting, but they are not the main purpose. Verifying that the system is aligned with the quality requirements is not relevant to this scenario, as quality requirements are related to how well the solution performs rather than what it does. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 76.

 The business analyst should clearly communicate project objectives and attempt to defuse tensions when there is concern that users may not accept a new product that forces them to change existing practices. Communication is a key skill for business analysts, as it helps to ensure that stakeholders understand the purpose, scope, benefits, and risks of the project and the solution. Communication also helps to manage stakeholder expectations, address their concerns, resolve conflicts, and gain their support and buy-in for the change. By communicating project objectives and trying to defuse tensions, the business analyst can demonstrate the value of the new product, explain the rationale behind the change, listen to the feedback and suggestions of the users, and foster a positive and collaborative relationship with them. Adhering to the project plan to achieve project objectives is not sufficient, as it does not address the user resistance or dissatisfaction with the new product. Voicing user concerns to management and recommending that the project be closed is not advisable, as it may undermine the project success and waste the resources invested in it. Delaying the application’s deployment until the conflicts have been resolved is not effective, as it may cause delays, rework, or scope creep in the project. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 55.

Requirements baseline is a document that contains the approved version of the requirements that serves as a reference point for further changes. Requirements baseline can help the business analyst to address the issue of underestimating the required budget and schedule by defining the scope, value, quality, risk, and feasibility of each requirement. Requirements baseline can also help to negotiate the scope in the contract with the customer by showing how each requirement aligns with their needs and expectations, and proposing possible trade-offs or alternatives. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

When a change request is received, the business analyst is responsible for analyzing the impact on business and underlying systems. The business analyst should assess how the change request will affect the business needs, objectives, and value, as well as the existing or planned systems, processes, and functions. The business analyst should also evaluate the feasibility, priority, and urgency of the change request, and provide recommendations and alternatives to the stakeholders. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 23; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 132.

 The business analyst must perform a cost-benefit analysis in order to complete the business case and arrive at a solid recommendation. A cost-benefit analysis is a technique that compares the costs and benefits of different options or alternatives for solving a business problem or achieving a business opportunity. A cost-benefit analysis helps to evaluate the return on investment (ROI), the net present value (NPV), and the payback period of each option, and to select the most optimal one based on the business value and the strategic alignment. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 40.

Competitive analysis is a technique to compare the strengths and weaknesses of similar products or services offered by competitors in the same market. Competitive analysis can help to identify opportunities, threats, and gaps in the market, and to develop strategies to increase sales and customer satisfaction. Competitive analysis can be used to identify solutions for the startup company that sells organic vegetable and fruit smoothies by comparing their best-selling juice with similar products offered by competitors. The other techniques are not suitable for this purpose. Benchmarking is a technique to compare the performance of a product, service, or process with a standard or best practice. Trend analysis is a technique to analyze historical data or patterns to forecast future outcomes or behaviors. Focus group is a technique to elicit opinions, preferences, or feedback from a representative group of customers or users. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 11; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 51.

 A configuration management system is a capability that will help ensure that the product conforms to approved requirements, changes can be documented, and the status of each change can be reported. A configuration management system is a system that consists of the processes, procedures, tools, and databases that are used to manage and control the configuration items of the project. A configuration item is any component of the project that has a defined and approved version, such as a requirement, a deliverable, a document, a model, a test case, etc. A configuration management system can help the business analyst and the project team to record, track, update, and maintain the configuration items throughout the project lifecycle, and to ensure their consistency, integrity, and traceability. A configuration management system can also help to handle changes, resolve issues, and measure the quality and performance of the project. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 133.

Clear and unambiguous requirements are crucial for verification. Ambiguity can lead to misunderstandings and difficulty in assessing whether the product meets the specified needs during testing. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide.

 A version control system is a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A version control system is a tool that allows the business analyst to manage and record changes to the requirements documentation throughout the project lifecycle. A version control system can help to ensure that the requirements documentation is consistent, accurate, and up-to-date. A version control system can also help to facilitate collaboration and communication among the team members and stakeholders who work on or use the requirements documentation. A version control system can also help to identify and resolve any conflicts or issues that may arise from concurrent or conflicting changes to the requirements documentation. An affinity diagram is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. An affinity diagram is a technique that involves grouping similar or related ideas, issues, or data into categories based on their affinity or similarity. An affinity diagram can help to organize and analyze complex or diverse information, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. A data dictionary is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A data dictionary is a tool that defines and describes the data elements and their attributes that are used or produced by a system or a solution. A data dictionary can help to standardize and clarify the meaning and usage of data elements, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. A business rules matrix is not a tool that can be used to track requirements documentation. A business rules matrix is a tool that documents and organizes the business rules that govern or constrain a system or a solution. A business rules matrix can help to specify and communicate the logic and behavior of a system or a solution, but it does not track or manage changes to the requirements documentation. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 161-162; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 19-20.

A SWOT analysis is a technique that helps to assess the internal and external factors that may affect the success of a solution or an option. A SWOT analysis involves identifying the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of each option, and comparing them with the business problem and the desired outcomes. A SWOT analysis can help the stakeholders to evaluate the feasibility, viability, and desirability of each option, and to select the best one based on the strategic alignment and the business value. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 41.

Validating the requirements is a key activity to reduce the risk of rework, especially for a project with a tight timeline and a lean budget. Validating the requirements means ensuring that they are aligned with the business needs, objectives, and expectations of the stakeholders, and that they are clear, complete, consistent, feasible, and testable. Validating the requirements can help the business analyst and the project team to identify and resolve any errors, gaps, conflicts, or ambiguities in the requirements before they are implemented, and to avoid any unnecessary changes or rework later in the project lifecycle. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 100.

Customer metrics on the existing system are an input into solution evaluation and decision making in this context, as they provide a baseline for measuring the performance and value of the new solution. The business analyst can use these metrics to compare the existing system with the new solution and assess how well the new solution meets the customer needs and expectations. A cost-benefit analysis of the existing system is not an input into solution evaluation and decision making, as it does not reflect the customer perspective or satisfaction with the system. Technical readiness of the development team is not an input into solution evaluation and decision making, as it does not relate to the quality or effectiveness of the new solution. A new solution design specification is not an input into solution evaluation and decision making, as it describes how the new solution will be built, not how it will perform or deliver value. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 176-177; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 20.

Status is a critical field that is needed to ensure that the traceability matrix is usable. Status indicates the current state of each requirement, such as approved, deferred, implemented, tested, or verified. Status helps to track the progress and completion of requirements throughout the project life cycle. It also helps to identify any gaps or discrepancies that may exist between the requirements and the project deliverables. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

 Brainstorming is a technique that allows the collection of the maximum number of ideas on a subject from a group without considering the validity or practicality of the ideas. The purpose of brainstorming is to generate as many ideas as possible in a short time, without judging or evaluating them. The ideas can be later prioritized, categorized, or refined by using other techniques. Interviewing is a technique that involves asking questions to individuals or groups to elicit information, opinions, or feedback. Prototyping is a technique that involves creating a model or a representation of a solution or a part of it to validate requirements, assumptions, or concepts. Surveying is a technique that involves collecting data from a large number of respondents using predefined questions and formats. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 71-72; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 15.

The business case provides the rationale for the project and includes an analysis of the costs and benefits. It is used to assess risks, including the potential need to cancel the product. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide.

Requirements management is a method for requirements change control. Requirements management is a process that involves planning, monitoring, and controlling the requirements and the solution throughout the project lifecycle. Requirements management can help the business analyst to ensure that the requirements are clear, complete, correct, and consistent, and that they align with the business needs and objectives. Requirements management can also help to handle changes to the requirements and the solution, and to communicate the impact and implications of the changes to the stakeholders. Requirements management can be done using various tools and techniques, such as a requirements management plan, a requirements traceability matrix, a change control system, and a configuration management system52. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline3, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, page 133.

The business analyst should check the traceability matrix to identify affected use cases. A traceability matrix can help the business analyst to find out which use cases are related to the new set of regulations, and how they will impact the scope, schedule, cost, quality, and risk of the project. The business analyst should also communicate the changes to the relevant stakeholders, and update the requirements documentation and the business analysis plan accordingly. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 100.

 The technical staff and testing team from Company A are responsible for writing and coding the requirements and testing the new functionality. Responsible means that the person or group is assigned to perform the work or activity. The responsible role is often indicated by the letter R in a RACI matrix, which is a tool for identifying roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 4, Section 4.3.2.3; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain II: Planning, Task 2.

 A force-field analysis is a tool that helps to identify and analyze the factors or forces that support or oppose a change or an initiative. It can help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative by showing the pros and cons of the initiative, as well as the relative strength and importance of each factor. A force-field analysis can also help to develop strategies to increase the supporting forces or decrease the opposing forces, or both, to achieve the desired outcome. A PEST analysis is a tool that helps to examine the external factors that affect an organization or an initiative, such as political, economic, social, and technological factors. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the internal factors or the balance of forces. A feasibility analysis is a tool that helps to evaluate the viability and suitability of a project or an initiative, as well as the risks and benefits associated with it. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the supporting and opposing forces. A gap analysis is a tool that helps to compare the current state and the desired state of a process, a product, or a service, and identify the gaps or differences between them. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the factors or forces that influence the initiative. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, What is Force Field Analysis: Definition and Example

 Solution scope is the set of features and functions that define the boundaries of the solution and align with the business requirements. Solution scope describes what will be included in and excluded from the new system, and helps to manage stakeholder expectations and avoid scope creep. The business analyst has defined the solution scope by working with project team members to define what will be included in and excluded from the new system. The other options are not correct. Solution design is the process of creating a detailed specification of how the solution will meet the requirements. Business requirements are the higher-level needs or goals of the organization or stakeholders that justify the project. Business case is a document that provides the justification for initiating a project based on its expected benefits, costs, and risks. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39.

The system requirements verification matrix is a tool that helps to track the status of each requirement throughout the project lifecycle. It shows whether a requirement has been accepted, rejected, deferred, or implemented. The business analyst should have used this tool to record the reasons for rejection or deferral of any requirement, as well as the impact and resolution of such changes. This way, the business analyst can easily provide a list of rejected and deferred requirements to the project manager upon request. Setting up a change control board is not enough to track the number of rejections, as it does not provide a detailed record of each requirement’s status. Limiting the number of rejected requirements on the project is not a realistic or helpful approach, as some requirements may be invalid, incomplete, or conflicting and need to be rejected or deferred for the benefit of the project. Spending more time up-front reviewing the requirements may reduce the chances of rejections, but it does not guarantee that no requirement will be rejected or deferred later in the project. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 161-162; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 19.

A business rule is a statement that defines or constrains some aspect of the business and always resolves to either true or false. Business rules are intended to assert business structure or to control or influence the behavior of the business. Business rules describe the operations, definitions and constraints that apply to an organization. Business rules can apply to people, processes, corporate behavior and computing systems in an organization, and are put in place to help the organization achieve its goals. By documenting a business rule, the business analyst can ensure that the business need can be validated against the criteria that govern the business operations and outcomes. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 19; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 97.

 Quality function deployment (QFD) is a technique that involves translating customer needs or requirements into product features or specifications. QFD helps to relate the product features to customer value by using a matrix called a House of Quality, which shows how each feature satisfies a customer requirement, how important each requirement is to the customer, how well each feature performs compared to competitors, and how each feature affects other features. QFD can also help to identify gaps or opportunities for improvement in the product design. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 69.

The best course of action to take when the customer reports defects after implementation of the product is to compare reported defects with user acceptance test results. User acceptance testing (UAT) is a process of verifying that the solution meets the requirements and expectations of the end users and delivers value to them. User acceptance testing involves preparing test cases, scenarios, or scripts based on the acceptance criteria, executing them with representative users or stakeholders, collecting feedback, identifying defects or issues, and obtaining sign-off or approval for deployment. By comparing reported defects with user acceptance test results, the business analyst can determine whether the defects were already detected and resolved during UAT, whether they were missed or overlooked during UAT, or whether they emerged after UAT due to changes in the environment, configuration, data, or usage. This can help to assess the impact and severity of the defects and decide on the appropriate actions to address them. Escalating the issue to the project manager since the acceptance was given by the customer is not helpful, as it does not involve investigating or resolving the defects. Doing nothing since the solution is now the responsibility of the operations manager is not responsible, as it does not ensure customer satisfaction or solution quality. Involving the end users and planning a new round of acceptance tests to check the gaps is not feasible, as it may be costly, time-consuming, and disruptive to conduct another UAT after implementation. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 80.

The business analyst should explain the value of requirements traceability to the project sponsor. Requirements traceability is the process of tracking and documenting the relationships and dependencies among the requirements, the project deliverables, and the business objectives. Requirements traceability helps to ensure the quality, completeness, and alignment of the requirements, and to manage the changes, risks, and issues that may arise during the project. Requirements traceability also helps to measure the performance and the value of the solution, and to facilitate the verification and validation of the solution. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 100.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, scope creep is the uncontrolled or unauthorized expansion of the project scope due to the addition or modification of requirements without proper approval or justification. Scope creep can negatively affect the project’s quality, schedule, cost, and stakeholder satisfaction. To avoid scope creep, the business analyst should define a requirements baseline, which is a set of agreed-upon and approved requirements that serves as a reference for further development and testing activities. The business analyst should also implement a change control process, which is a formal and systematic procedure for managing and documenting any changes to the requirements or scope. The change control process should include steps such as identifying, analyzing, evaluating, approving, communicating, and implementing the changes, as well as updating the requirements baseline and traceability matrix accordingly. References:

• PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: Study.com

The selected project life cycle is a characteristic of the project that is needed to determine the approach so that the business analyst can validate whether they will need to have a discussion about the budget. The project life cycle is the sequence of phases or stages that the project goes through from initiation to closure. The project life cycle can be selected based on various factors, such as the nature, complexity, size, and uncertainty of the project, the stakeholder preferences, the organizational culture, and the industry standards. The project life cycle can influence the approach that the business analyst and the project team use to plan, execute, monitor, and control the project, and to deliver the product or service. The project life cycle can also affect the budget, schedule, scope, and quality of the project, and the level of stakeholder involvement and communication. Therefore, the business analyst should understand the selected project life cycle and its implications for the project, and validate whether it is appropriate and feasible for the project, and whether it requires any adjustments or discussions with the stakeholders. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 84.

The main reason for the business failure was a failure to establish measurable success criteria in the business case. The success criteria are the standards or indicators that are used to measure the achievement of the business objectives and the expected benefits of the project. The success criteria should be defined and agreed upon by the stakeholders in the business case, and they should be specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound (SMART). The success criteria can help the business analyst and the project team to evaluate the feasibility, viability, and desirability of the project, and to monitor and control the project performance and outcomes. The success criteria can also help to ensure the alignment of the project deliverables with the stakeholder expectations and the market needs. If the success criteria are not established or are poorly defined in the business case, the project may fail to deliver the desired value and return on investment, even if it meets the time, cost, scope, and quality constraints. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 16; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 86.

 A user survey is a technique that can be used to determine how well the solution meets the business case. A user survey is a method of collecting feedback from the end users of the solution about their satisfaction, preferences, expectations, needs, problems, or suggestions. A user survey can help to measure the performance, quality, usability, and value of the solution and compare it with the expected benefits and outcomes defined in the business case. A user survey can also help to identify areas for improvement or enhancement of the solution. Asking the sponsor for feedback is not sufficient to determine how well the solution meets the business case, as it does not capture the perspective of the end users who are directly affected by the solution. Surveying the project is not relevant to this scenario, as it does not focus on the solution but rather on the project management processes and practices. Comparing the results of day-in-the-life (DITL) testing and integration testing is not effective, as it does not reflect the actual usage and experience of the solution by the end users after deployment. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 80.

 Prototyping is a tool or technique that could have been used by the business analyst to avoid the situation of unclear and conflicting requirements. Prototyping is the process of creating a simplified and partial version of the product or system that can be used to elicit, validate, and refine the requirements. Prototyping can help the business analyst and the stakeholders to visualize the solution, to identify and resolve any issues or gaps, and to reach a common understanding and agreement on the requirements. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 94.

A questionnaire is an elicitation technique that involves sending a set of written questions to a large number of users or stakeholders to gather information about their needs, preferences, opinions, or feedback. A questionnaire is best suited for eliciting information from a large group of users in a short period of time, as it is cost-effective, easy to administer, and allows for anonymity and standardization. A questionnaire can also reach users who are geographically dispersed or unavailable for face-to-face meetings. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 6, Section 6.3.2.9; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain III: Analysis, Task 2.

A test case is a set of conditions or variables under which a tester will determine whether a system under test satisfies the requirements or works correctly. A test case is derived from the requirements and the acceptance criteria, and it specifies the input data, expected output, and execution steps. A test case is incorrect if it does not match the requirements or the acceptance criteria, or if it contains errors, ambiguities, or inconsistencies. If the business analyst receives a test result report that shows evidence of defective functionality, but verifies that the functionality behaves according to the requirements, the business analyst should first verify that the test case is incorrect. This can be done by reviewing the test case, comparing it with the requirements and the acceptance criteria, and identifying any discrepancies or flaws. By verifying that the test case is incorrect, the business analyst can avoid unnecessary changes to the requirements or the solution, and ensure that the test results are valid and reliable. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline3, page 21; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, page 101.

 A closed-ended survey using the Likert scale is a type of survey that asks respondents to indicate their level of agreement or disagreement with a series of statements related to the current business process. This type of survey is useful for gathering data that can be used in a statistical analysis to measure user satisfaction, identify pain points, and evaluate the performance of the current business process. A closed-ended survey is also easier to administer and analyze than an open-ended survey, which requires more time and effort to code and interpret the responses. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 91.

 The change control process is a set of procedures and tools that are used to manage changes to the requirements and the solution throughout the project life cycle. The change control process is defined in the business analysis plan, which is a document that describes how the business analysis activities will be performed, monitored, and controlled. The business analysis plan also specifies the roles and responsibilities of the business analyst and other stakeholders involved in the change control process. The business analyst should follow the change control process as defined in the business analysis plan to ensure that any changes to the requirements are properly documented, analyzed, approved, communicated, and implemented. By following the change control process, the business analyst can avoid scope creep, maintain the quality and integrity of the requirements, and align the solution with the business needs and objectives. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 133.

 According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a prototype is a tool that can be used to demonstrate the features and functionality of a product or solution in an iterative manner. A prototype can help to elicit, validate, and verify requirements, as well as to obtain feedback and approval from stakeholders. A prototype can also help to reduce risks, errors, and rework, and to increase customer satisfaction and quality. A proof-of-concept model is a type of prototype that is used to test the feasibility and viability of a product or solution. A proof-of-concept model can help to show the benefits and value of the product or solution, and to identify any technical or business challenges or constraints. References:

• PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: Study.com

 A requirements traceability matrix is a tool that shows the relationship between each requirement and other project elements, such as objectives, deliverables, test cases, design components, etc. A requirements traceability matrix can help the business analyst to determine the impact for the specific requirement change by showing how the change affects other related requirements and project elements. A requirements traceability matrix can also help to assess the feasibility, scope, value, and risk of the change request. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

 Phased baselining is an approach that involves dividing the requirements into smaller subsets or increments that can be approved, developed, and delivered separately. Phased baselining can help to cope with the requirements’ volatility, as it allows the business analyst and the stakeholders to accommodate changes and feedback in each increment, and to adjust the scope and priorities of the subsequent increments accordingly. Phased baselining can also reduce the risk and uncertainty of the project, as it enables early validation and verification of the solution, and provides more flexibility and adaptability to the changing business environment and regulations. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 133.

 A weighted-ranking matrix is a technique that involves assigning scores and weights to different criteria and options to compare and prioritize them. A weighted-ranking matrix can help the business analyst to prepare the recommendation by quantifying and ranking the three different solution options based on their alignment with the business objectives, benefits, costs, risks, and other factors. A weighted-ranking matrix can also help to justify and communicate the recommendation with evidence and transparency. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 66.

User acceptance testing (UAT) is a process that should be done by the business analyst after the software developers have delivered a completed solution and the quality assurance team has passed it. User acceptance testing is a process of verifying that the solution meets the requirements and expectations of the end users and delivers value to them. User acceptance testing involves preparing test cases, scenarios, or scripts based on the acceptance criteria, executing them with representative users or stakeholders, collecting feedback, identifying defects or issues, and obtaining sign-off or approval for deployment. User acceptance testing can help to ensure that the solution is fit for use, suitable for purpose, and aligned with business objectives. Evaluating the solution against the project charter is not necessary at this stage, as it does not involve testing or validation by the end users or stakeholders. Evaluating the solution with the sponsor(s) is not sufficient at this stage, as it does not capture the perspective of all relevant users or stakeholders who will use or benefit from the solution. Conducting performance testing is not relevant at this stage, as it is usually done by the quality assurance team before delivering the solution to ensure that it meets the non-functional requirements such as speed, reliability, scalability, etc. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 80.

 According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, the business analyst should recommend the option with the highest functionality score and the lowest cost score. In this case, option A, 1, Custom solution, has the highest functionality score of 10 and the lowest cost score of 1. Therefore, it should be recommended. References:

• PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: PMI.com

 Value-ranking criteria are a set of factors or measures that are used to evaluate and prioritize the value of backlog items. Value-ranking criteria can include business objectives, benefits, costs, risks, dependencies, urgency, etc. The stakeholders follow the value-ranking criteria to determine the value of backlog items based on their alignment with the project vision and goals. The stakeholders can also use techniques such as MoSCoW analysis or weighted ranking matrix to apply the value-ranking criteria. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 66.