SD-WAN-Engineer Palo Alto Networks SD-WAN Engineer Questions and Answers

In large-scale Prisma SD-WAN deployments, such as a retail network with 1,000 branches, architectural resilience is achieved through a strategy known as Hub Clustering. A Data Center Cluster is a logical grouping of ION devices at a hub site that provides termination for branch-to-DC VPN tunnels. To prevent the creation of a massive, single fault domain, Palo Alto Networks best practices recommend segmenting the branch population across multiple clusters.

By creating more than one data center cluster in each data center and strategically assigning sites to these clusters, an administrator can effectively isolate failure events. In a metropolitan area where stores are concentrated, spreading nearby retail locations across different clusters ensures that a localized resource failure or a cluster-specific misconfiguration only impacts a subset of the stores in that region rather than causing a complete regional outage.

This design directly addresses the requirement for maintaining application availability. Since Data Center 1 and Data Center 2 host different applications, each branch site must maintain active paths to both DCs. By using multiple clusters at each DC, the risk management group's goal of avoiding a large fault domain is met through "blast radius" containment. If Cluster A at Data Center 1 fails, the 1,000 sites are not all affected simultaneously; instead, only the specific sites bound to Cluster A lose connectivity to that hub, while their neighbors bound to Cluster B remain functional. This approach provides the highest level of regional resiliency and operational stability for high-density retail environments.

For a massive rollout involving 1,000 branch sites, Prisma SD-WAN (formerly CloudGenix) provides a specialized workflow known as Bulk Site Configuration. This method is designed to minimize manual intervention and maximize deployment velocity by leveraging Site Templates and Device Shells.

In this scenario, the primary architectural advantage of Option C is the use of Pre-Staging. By exporting an empty SD-WAN device CSV from the Prisma SD-WAN Controller and populating it with data from the corporate CMDB, administrators can perform a bulk upload to create hundreds or thousands of sites and device shells simultaneously in the management portal. A "Device Shell" acts as a placeholder for a physical ION device that has not yet connected to the cloud. It contains all the site-specific configuration—such as interface roles, circuit labels, and IP addressing—waiting for a serial number to be associated with it.

When the field technician performs the physical "rack and stack," they simply connect the ION device to the internet (via ISP modem or cellular). Through Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP), the device automatically "phones home" to the Prisma SD-WAN Cloud Controller using its Manufacturer Installed Certificate (MIC). Because the configuration was pre-created via the CSV bulk upload, the controller recognizes the device (once assigned to its shell) and immediately pushes the complete configuration. This eliminates the need for the field tech to access a console port or perform local configuration, reducing their on-site time to the bare minimum. While APIs (Option D) can be used for automation, the built-in CSV template workflow is the standard, documented "best practice" for rapidly translating CMDB data into a functioning SD-WAN fabric at this scale.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

In the Prisma Access architecture (integrated with SD-WAN), distinct connection types serve different purposes.

Remote Networks: These are the connections from your Branch sites (using ION devices) into the cloud. They allow branches to get to the internet or other branches.

Service Connections (SC): This is a specialized high-bandwidth connection used to bridge the Prisma Access Cloud to your Private Data Center or Headquarters.

The primary use case for a Service Connection (Option A) is to allow mobile users and branch users (who are connected to the Prisma cloud) to reach private, centralized resources that still reside on-premise, such as Active Directory controllers, legacy databases, or mainframes. Without a Service Connection, users in the cloud would be able to reach the internet and each other, but not the servers physically located in your HQ data center. The CloudBlade automates the creation of these tunnels, but architecturally, the "Service Connection" is the "cloud-to-HQ" bridge.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

Prisma SD-WAN calculates the Mean Opinion Score (MOS) to provide a standardized metric (1-5) for voice quality. To ensure the system always knows the "voice readiness" of a path—even before a call starts—it uses Active Probes (synthetic UDP packets).

While latency is measured, the MOS calculation algorithm is most heavily penalized by Packet Loss (D) and Jitter (B).

Packet Loss: Even a small amount of loss (e.g., >1%) dramatically reduces voice clarity, causing dropouts.

Jitter: High variance in packet arrival time (jitter) causes the "robotic" voice effect and buffer underruns.

The system continuously measures these specific metrics on all WAN links using synthetic probes. If the packet loss or jitter exceeds the threshold defined in the "Path Quality Profile" (e.g., Voice Profile), the path is marked as non-compliant, and the MOS score drops, triggering a policy action to move the flow. Throughput (C) is less critical for voice as calls consume very little bandwidth (e.g., 64-100 Kbps), making congestion (loss/jitter) the primary enemy, not raw speed.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

The CloudBlade platform is a distinguishing architectural component of the Prisma SD-WAN solution. It is not a physical piece of hardware, nor is it software that runs directly on the branch ION device's CPU.

Instead, the CloudBlade platform is a cloud-based API integration layer hosted by Palo Alto Networks. It functions as an intelligent broker or "translator" between the Prisma SD-WAN Controller and external third-party services (such as Prisma Access, Amazon Web Services, Azure, ServiceNow, or Zscaler).

When an administrator configures the Prisma Access CloudBlade, for example, they input their API credentials and intent (e.g., "Connect all US branches to US West"). The CloudBlade engine then:

Communicates with the Prisma Access API to provision the remote IPSec termination nodes (Security Processing Nodes).

Translates this configuration into specific instruction sets for the Prisma SD-WAN Controller.

The Controller then pushes the necessary VPN tunnel configurations, IKE parameters, and routing rules to the relevant ION devices.

This architecture eliminates the need for manual IPSec configuration on every branch device. It ensures that if the third-party service changes its IP addresses or settings, the CloudBlade can detect the change via API and automatically update the branch fleet, maintaining connectivity without manual administrator intervention.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

The Prisma SD-WAN (ION) QoS engine utilizes a hierarchical queuing structure designed to provide granular control over application performance. Each WAN interface on an ION device supports a total of 16 QoS queues.

This 16-queue structure is derived from a matrix of 4 Classes (often referred to as Priority Classes) multiplied by 4 Application Criteria (Traffic Types).2

4 Priority Classes: The system defines four high-level business priority categories:3

Platinum (Highest priority)4

Gold

Silver

Bronze (Lowest priority/Best Effort)5

4 Application Criteria (Sub-queues): Within each of the four priority classes, the system further categorizes traffic into four specific application types to ensure proper handling (e.g., ensuring voice doesn't get stuck behind bulk data even within the same priority level):6

Real-Time Video

Real-Time Audio

Transactional

Bulk7

Calculation: 4 Priority Classes × 4 Application Types = 16 Total Queues per interface. This structure allows the scheduler to ensure that a "Platinum" voice call is prioritized over "Platinum" bulk data, and both are prioritized over "Gold" traffic.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

In Prisma SD-WAN, security policies can be applied via Policy Stacks, which often have a hierarchy.

Stack Precedence: A common configuration involves a Global Security Stack (applied to all sites) and a Local/Site Security Stack (specific to one site). If the administrator configured a "Global" rule that says "Deny Access to Gambling Sites" (or a specific IP list), and that rule is higher in the binding order or part of a higher-priority stack, it will enforce the block before the local "Allow Guest to Internet" rule is processed.

Specifics of "REJECT": The state REJECT specifically implies a policy enforcement action (sending a TCP RST or ICMP Unreachable) rather than a silent drop or a routing failure.

Why not A? If the "Allow" rule is at the top and matches the traffic parameters (Zone/IP), the Default Deny at the bottom would never be reached. The issue implies a higher priority Deny exists.

Prisma SD-WAN licensing is structured to provide flexibility while ensuring that all components of the secure fabric are correctly accounted for. To meet the requirements of this organization, we must calculate the necessary subscriptions for both the data center hubs and the distributed branch network.

First, we address the Data Center Subscriptions. The organization has two main geographically separate data centers and one small data center, all of which require High Availability (HA). In a Prisma SD-WAN deployment, HA at a site is achieved by deploying two ION devices in a cluster. Palo Alto Networks licensing requires a separate Data Center subscription for each ION device acting as a hub. Therefore, with three data center locations (2 main + 1 small) each requiring an HA pair (2 devices per site), a total of six data center subscriptions (Option A) are required to license all six hub appliances.

Second, we address the Branch Subscriptions. The organization has 50 branches but lacks accurate measurements of actual bandwidth consumption. Palo Alto Networks' best practice for such scenarios is the Aggregate Bandwidth Subscription model (Option B). Instead of purchasing a fixed "Branch subscription per site" (Option D)—which requires knowing the exact throughput needs for every individual location—the aggregate model allows the customer to purchase a total pool of bandwidth (e.g., 5 Gbps) that is shared across all 50 branch sites.

This "pay-as-you-grow" approach is ideal when consumption patterns are unknown or inconsistent. As branches utilize the bandwidth, it is deducted from the central pool. This avoids the risk of over-provisioning licenses at low-usage sites or under-provisioning at high-usage sites. Together, the six DC subscriptions and the aggregate bandwidth pool provide a fully licensed, HA-capable SD-WAN environment that aligns with Palo Alto Networks' scaling recommendations.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

This scenario depicts a High Availability (HA) topology utilizing the ION 1200-S model's Fail-to-Wire (bypass) capabilities to share WAN links between two devices without needing external switches for every WAN connection.

1. WAN Link Availability (Statement A):

The diagram illustrates a "daisy-chain" cabling method supported by the ION 1200-S bypass pairs.

ISP A (Green): Connects directly to the "Standby" (Left) unit first. Since the Standby unit remains powered on, it maintains direct access to ISP A.

LTE/5G (Blue): Connects to the "Active" (Right) unit first. The connection then loops through a bypass pair on the Active unit to the Standby unit. When power is removed from the "Active" unit, the fail-to-wire relays on its Ethernet ports close physically. This creates a passive electrical bridge that connects the LTE modem directly to the Standby unit. The Standby unit (now becoming Active) will detect the link state change and successfully utilize the LTE connection. Therefore, both WAN links remain usable.

2. LAN Failover Mechanism (Statement C):

Prisma SD-WAN ION devices typically use a VRRP-like mechanism for LAN redundancy.

When the "Active" node fails (loses power), the "Standby" node stops receiving keepalives and promotes itself to the Active state.

To ensure downstream switches and clients immediately send traffic to the new Active unit, it must update their ARP tables. It does this by broadcasting a Gratuitous ARP (GARP) packet for the Virtual IP (VIP) address of the Switch Virtual Interfaces (SVIs). This action informs the network that the MAC address associated with the Gateway I1P is now reachable via the port connected to the new Active ION.234

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

Site Templates (often referred to as Site Configuration Templates) are a critical tool for the Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) of large-scale deployments in Prisma SD-WAN.

1. Device Pre-staging (Statement C):

One of the primary capabilities of Site Templates is the creation of Device Shells. A device shell is a configuration container that exists in the controller before the physical hardware is installed or connected. By using a template, an administrator can pre-provision the entire configuration (interfaces, routing, subnets) for the "Site" and "Element" (Device). When the physical ION device is later connected to the internet and claimed (associated with the shell via its Serial Number), it immediately inherits this pre-staged configuration, enabling a true "plug-and-play" deployment.

2. Mandatory Variables (Statement B):

To successfully instantiate a functional site from a generic template, specific unique identifiers are required in the variable data set (typically a CSV file).

Site Name: Identifies the location in the portal.

ION Software Version: Ensures the device boots to the specific validated code version required for the deployment, preventing inconsistencies.

ION Serial Number / Device Name: Required to bind the logical configuration (Shell) to the physical hardware. Even if the serial is added later during the claim process, the structure of the template and the deployment workflow mandates these variables to ensure the device can be uniquely identified and managed within the fabric.

Note on Option D: While it is technically possible to re-deploy a template, the Best Practice for "Day 2" operations (updating or modifying configuration after deployment) is to use Prisma SD-WAN Stacks (Network Stacks, Security Stacks, etc.). Stacks allow for granular, policy-based updates across multiple sites without the destructive or rigid nature of re-applying a full site initialization template. Therefore, D is not the aligned best practice.

In a Prisma SD-WAN deployment, the routing of traffic between branches and Data Centers (DCs) relies on the proper synchronization between the AppFabric (the overlay) and the local routing protocols (the underlay/LAN side). In this scenario, the branch can successfully reach DC1, indicating the branch ION is correctly participating in the fabric. However, traffic to DC2 (10.2.2.22) is failing.

The DC2 site has the site prefix 10.2.2.0/23 configured. In Prisma SD-WAN, defining a site prefix informs the Controller that this specific subnet "belongs" to that site, causing the Controller to advertise reachability for this prefix to all other ION devices in the fabric. Consequently, when the branch ION (192.168.1.123) attempts to reach 10.2.2.22, it correctly identifies DC2 as the destination and encapsulates the traffic toward the DC2 ION.

The bottleneck occurs once the packet arrives at the DC2 ION. While the ION is advertising the branch subnet (192.168.1.0/24) to the DC Core (ensuring the return path), the ION itself must know how to forward the incoming traffic from the branch to the internal DC network. If the DC2 ION does not have a specific route in its local routing table for the 10.2.2.0/23 subnet pointing to the DC Core's internal interface, the packet will be dropped.

According to Palo Alto Networks best practices for Data Center ION deployment, a static default route (0.0.0.0/0) should be configured on the ION device pointing toward the DC Core’s next-hop IP address. This ensures that any traffic received from the AppFabric destined for internal DC resources—which are not directly connected to the ION—is successfully handed off to the core switching fabric for final delivery. Adding this default route (Option A) resolves the reachability issue by providing the "last-hop" routing instruction within the DC.

In the Prisma SD-WAN solution, multi-tenancy and network isolation are achieved through the use of Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instances. However, there are many operational scenarios—such as providing shared access to a common service (e.g., DNS, NTP) or a central Internet gateway—where traffic must transition between these isolated routing domains. This process is known as route leaking.

In the Prisma SD-WAN management interface, route leaking is specifically configured within the VRF Profile. Unlike traditional CLI-based routers where route leaking might be configured under a global routing table or individual VRF definitions via import/export targets, Prisma SD-WAN utilizes a profile-based approach to ensure scalability and consistency across multiple sites. A VRF Profile acts as a template that defines the routing behavior for specific VRFs across the fabric.

When an administrator navigates to the VRF Profile settings, they can define "Leaking Rules." These rules specify the "From VRF" (source) and "To VRF" (destination) parameters, along with the specific prefixes or default routes that should be shared. By placing this configuration within the VRF Profile rather than a site-specific configuration, Palo Alto Networks allows for a "configure once, apply many" workflow. Once the VRF Profile is updated with the leaking rules, any ION device associated with that profile will automatically update its local routing table to allow the specified inter-VRF communication. This centralized orchestration simplifies the management of complex segmentation requirements in large-scale SD-WAN deployments.

In Prisma SD-WAN, application performance is monitored through distinct metrics that separate network health from application health. The provided graph displays Network Transfer Time (NTT) in blue and Server Response Time (SRT) in orange. NTT measures the round-trip time of packets traversing the WAN fabric, while SRT measures the time elapsed from when the server receives a request to when it sends the first response packet.

Analysis of the telemetry data shows that the NTT (blue line) remains consistently low and stable, generally staying below 100 milliseconds throughout the capture period. This indicates that the SD-WAN path and underlying network circuits are not the source of the latency. Conversely, the SRT (orange line) exhibits significant and erratic spikes, reaching as high as 450 to 475 milliseconds. These spikes occur while the network latency (NTT) remains flat.

Because the latency increases are isolated to the SRT metric, the root cause is confirmed to be on the Application Server side. This pattern typically suggests that the server is struggling with resource exhaustion, high CPU utilization, or database query delays during peak processing times. For a real-time application, these SRT spikes translate directly to jitter and "lag" for the end-user. By distinguishing between these two metrics, Prisma SD-WAN allows network administrators to prove that the network is performing within SLA and shift the troubleshooting focus to the application or server management teams, significantly reducing mean time to innocence (MTTI).

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

Prisma Access manages Remote Network bandwidth using an Aggregate Bandwidth licensing model.

Compute Locations: When you purchase bandwidth (e.g., 1 Gbps), you allocate it to specific Prisma Access Compute Locations (e.g., US West, Europe Central).

Shared Pool: All branch sites (Remote Networks) that connect to that specific Compute Location share the allocated bandwidth pool. For example, if you allocate 500 Mbps to "US West" and connect 10 branches to it, they compete for that 500 Mbps aggregate.

Bursting: An individual branch is not strictly rate-limited to a "slice" (e.g., 50 Mbps) unless you explicitly configure QoS guarantees. By default, a single branch can burst and consume a large portion of the aggregate pool if other branches are idle. The enforcement happens at the Region/Compute Node level, ensuring the total throughput does not exceed the licensed capacity for that region.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

In a Prisma SD-WAN High Availability (HA) deployment, the HA Control Interface is the critical lifeline used to synchronize state, heartbeats, and flow information between the Active and Standby ION devices.

The strict requirement for this connection is that it must be Layer 2 adjacent.

Best Practice: A direct physical cable connection between the designated HA ports of the two devices (e.g., Port 2 on Device A to Port 2 on Device B).

Alternative: Connectivity through a switch on a dedicated, isolated VLAN is supported, provided the devices are in the same broadcast domain and subnet.

Routing (Layer 3) is not supported for the HA Control link because the keepalive mechanism relies on low-latency, multicast/broadcast-level adjacency to detect failures instantly (sub-second failover). If the HA link were routed (Option A), network latency or router convergence issues could cause "Split-Brain" scenarios where both devices assume the Active role, leading to IP conflicts and traffic loops. Option C is incorrect because the Controller is too slow to manage real-time failover; the decision must be local.

Prisma SD-WAN High Availability (HA) for branch ION devices, particularly the Gen-2 ION 1200-S, is designed to provide "100% WAN Capacity" preservation during a hardware or power failure. This is achieved through the use of Bypass Pairs (Fail-to-Wire). In the provided topology, the ISP A and LTE/5G circuits are cross-connected using the bypass ports (typically ports 3 and 4 on the ION 1200-S).

When the "Active" ION device loses power, the internal physical relays in its bypass ports transition to a closed state, effectively creating a physical bridge between the ports. In this scenario, the LTE/5G signal—which enters the Active ION's port 4—is mechanically bridged to port 3, allowing it to pass through to port 4 of the Standby ION. Simultaneously, ISP A is already connected to the Standby ION. Consequently, once the Standby device completes its transition to the "Active" state, it has physical access to both WAN circuits, validating Statement A.

Regarding the LAN transition, Prisma SD-WAN does not use standard VRRP for ION-to-ION HA; instead, it uses a proprietary Control Plane HA mechanism. When the failover occurs, the newly active ION takes over the IP addresses of all configured Switch Virtual Interfaces (SVIs) and LAN interfaces. To ensure the downstream Layer 2 infrastructure (like the LAN switches shown in the diagram) updates its MAC address tables to point to the new physical hardware for those IPs, the newly active ION immediately broadcasts a Gratuitous ARP (GARP). This ensures that LAN traffic is correctly steered to the new device without a significant timeout, validating Statement C.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

The RMA replacement process in Prisma SD-WAN is designed to be seamless, leveraging the decoupling of logical configuration from physical hardware.

Replace Device Workflow: The administrator should use the "Replace Device" (or RMA) function within the portal. This workflow allows you to select the "Defective" device (old serial) and the "Replacement" device (new serial).

Configuration Transfer: Once executed, the system automatically binds the existing Device Shell (which contains all interface configs, routing policies, and site associations) to the new hardware's serial number. The new device, once connected to the internet, will "call home," identify itself, and download the exact configuration of the previous unit.

License Transfer: While the configuration moves automatically, the Support License transfer typically requires a specific step in the Customer Support Portal (CSP) or happens automatically if processed as a formal RMA order. Options A and D are incorrect because they involve manual reconfiguration, which is unnecessary and error-prone. Option C is incorrect as the ION platform relies on cloud-based config management, not local USB backups for hardware swaps.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

In the Prisma SD-WAN (CloudGenix) Zero Touch Provisioning (ZTP) lifecycle, the device status transitions through specific stages that indicate its readiness and connectivity.

When an administrator enters the Claim Code (or Serial Number/Claim Code pair) into the portal, the device status immediately updates to "Claimed".

This status confirms that the portal has registered the device's unique identity and associated it with the customer's tenant. However, "Claimed" does not necessarily mean the device is fully operational or passing traffic yet. It simply signifies that the ownership is verified.

Once the physical device at the site successfully connects to the internet and reaches the Prisma SD-WAN Controller (using the call-home function), it will authenticate using its installed certificate. Upon successful authentication and the establishment of the secure control channel, the status will transition from "Claimed" to "Online".

Only after the device is "Online" can the controller push the specific site configuration (Device Shell), policies, and IP addressing required for the device to become "Provisioned" and eventually "Active" in the data path. If the device remains in the "Claimed" state for an extended period, it indicates that the hardware has not yet successfully contacted the controller, which prompts troubleshooting of the physical internet circuit or firewall rules upstream.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

To diagnose specific VPN negotiation failures (Phase 1 or Phase 2 IPSec issues), the Event Logs (specifically filtered for System or VPN events) are the correct resource.

Event Logs: This section records the control plane signaling messages. If a VPN tunnel fails to establish, the Event Log will generate an entry containing the specific IKE failure reason sent by the peer or generated locally. Common errors found here include INVALID_COOKIE, NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN (mismatch in encryption algorithms), or PRE_SHARED_KEY_MISMATCH.

Flow Browser (A): This shows user traffic (TCP/UDP sessions). If the VPN is down, user traffic won't even enter the tunnel, so the Flow Browser will just show dropped flows or blackholes, but it won't explain why the tunnel itself is broken.

Link Quality (D): This shows latency/loss graphs for established tunnels. It cannot diagnose why a tunnel failed to form in the first place.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

According to Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN administrator documentation regarding Path Policy configuration, specific rules apply when utilizing Standard VPNs (IPSec tunnels to non-ION devices, such as Prisma Access or third-party firewalls) as an L3 Failure Path.

When a Path Policy rule is configured, the administrator defines Active Paths, Backup Paths, and L3 Failure Paths. The L3 Failure Path is a "last resort" mechanism used when all Active and Backup paths are unavailable (Layer 3 down).

If Standard VPN is selected as the L3 Failure Path type, the system explicitly requires that the administrator also associates it with a specific Standard Services and DC Group within that same policy rule.

The ION device uses the Standard Services and DC Group to identify the specific remote endpoint (tunnel destination) where the traffic should be routed. Unlike a "Direct" (Internet) path which can simply route out to the WAN, a Standard VPN represents a logical tunnel. If the policy rule designates "Standard VPN" as the failure path but leaves the "Standard Services and DC Group" field empty or unselected, the ION effectively has a directive to "use a VPN" but lacks the instruction on which VPN group to use for this specific application context. Consequently, even if the IPSec tunnel to Prisma Access is physically up and stable, the policy engine cannot resolve the next hop for the "SuperSaaSApp" traffic, resulting in the packets being dropped. To resolve this, the administrator must edit the Path Policy rule to ensure the specific Standard Service/DC Group representing Prisma Access is checked/selected for the L3 Failure Path.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

The ION 9000 is the flagship high-performance hardware model designed for large Data Centers and Campus Cores.

10GbE Connectivity (C): The defining hardware differentiator for the ION 9000 is its inclusion of multiple 10 Gigabit Ethernet (SFP+) interfaces. This allows it to interconnect with Data Center core switches at 10Gbps speeds, supporting the multi-gigabit aggregate throughput required for hub sites aggregating traffic from hundreds of branches.

ION 3000: The ION 3000 is a branch-tier device limited to 1 Gigabit Ethernet (copper/SFP) interfaces.

Bypass Pairs (B): Both models (and others like ION 2000/7000) support Bypass Pairs.

LTE/PoE (A/D): These are typically features of smaller branch/edge models (like ION 1200), not the high-end DC concentrators.

The provided graph displays the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) for two cellular carriers, Carrier-1 (blue line) and Carrier-2 (green line), over a specific period. In cellular communications, SNR is a critical metric used to determine the quality of a wireless signal. A higher SNR indicates a cleaner, stronger signal, while a lower SNR indicates that the signal is being "drowned out" by background noise or interference, which directly correlates to performance degradation, packet loss, and lower throughput.

Looking at the graph, Carrier-1 experiences a significant and sustained drop in SNR, falling from roughly 4.5 dB to nearly 0.5 dB for the majority of the time duration. This drastic reduction in signal quality strongly suggests that Carrier-1 may have experienced performance degradation (Option A). During this dip, the link quality would likely fall below the configured thresholds for business-critical application traffic.

Because Prisma SD-WAN is an application-defined fabric that continuously monitors path health, the ION device would detect this degradation on Carrier-1. If Carrier-2 maintains a significantly higher and more stable SNR (as shown by the green line remaining between 4.5 dB and 6.5 dB), the ION device's Path Selection engine would automatically steer traffic away from the degraded link. Consequently, it is highly probable that Carrier-1 traffic switched over to Carrier-2 (Option D) to maintain the application SLA. This automated failover is a core strength of the Prisma SD-WAN architecture, ensuring that the best available path is utilized based on real-time link statistics rather than simple "up/down" states.