1z0-1046-24 Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud 2024 Implementation Professional Questions and Answers

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, the Person Gallery page displays various cards (e.g., Employment, Personal Information, etc.) that provide quick access to worker details. To reorder these cards, including arranging them in reverse alphabetical order, the system does not provide a direct configuration option within Portrait Settings to automatically sort cards alphabetically or reverse alphabetically. Instead, reordering is achieved through personalization, which allows administrators or users with appropriate permissions to manually adjust the layout of the Person Gallery page.

Option D ("Drag and slide the portrait cards across the pane in any order. Use Personalization to edit and reorder the portrait cards") is correct because Oracle HCM Cloud supports personalization of the user interface via tools like Page Composer. In Page Composer, an administrator can access the Person Gallery page, enter personalization mode, and drag and drop the cards into the desired order, such as reverse alphabetical. This change can then be saved and applied globally or for specific roles, depending on the personalization scope. The Oracle documentation, specifically "Oracle Applications Cloud: Configuring and Extending Applications," details how Page Composer enables such UI modifications.

Option A ("Enable 'Allow Reorder' in Portrait Settings") is incorrect because there is no "Allow Reorder" setting in Portrait Settings that directly controls card ordering on the Person Gallery. Portrait Settings typically manage visibility and default card selection, not manual reordering.

Option B ("Change the order of the cards by using Portrait Settings") is misleading. While Portrait Settings allow some configuration (e.g., setting the default card), they do not provide a mechanism to reorder all cards manually or systematically in reverse alphabetical order.

Option C ("Change the default card to 'User Account Details' in Portrait Settings") only affects which card appears first by default and does not address reordering the full set of cards.

Option E ("Enable 'Allow User Control' in Portrait Settings") relates to giving users control over certain card settings, but it does not enable reordering of cards on the gallery page.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The Global Search in Oracle HCM Cloud relies on the "Update Person Search Keyword" process, which maintains a keyword index for person records. This process updates the index with the latest effective-dated attributes (e.g., job) as of the process run date, not historical data tied to specific effective dates. In this case, the employee’s job changed from "Recruiter" (effective 01-Jan-2023) to "Consultant" (effective 01-Feb-2023). By 01-Mar-2023, when the HR specialist searches, the keyword index reflects the latest job ("Consultant") because the process overwrites prior values with the most recent effective-dated record. Thus, searching for "Recruiter" with an effective date of 31-Jan-2023 fails because the historical job isn’t preserved in the index—only "Consultant" is searchable.

Option A is incorrect because Job attributes are supported in searches. Options B and D (process failures) lack evidence and don’t explain the behavior. Option C is misleading—effective dates aren’t associated in the index; they’re overwritten. Option E is wrong because date-effective searches are supported, but the index limits results to current data. Option F correctly identifies that the latest job ("Consultant") replaced "Recruiter" in the keyword record.

The Redwood Grade Rates page in Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud has been enhanced to improve usability, particularly in searching and filtering grade rate data. The question asks for the new feature added to enhance search and filtering capabilities. Oracle’s 24C release noteshighlight specific improvements to the Redwood interface for grade rates, focusing on streamlined data retrieval.

Option A: Capability to search and filter grade rate values by name, code, and set

This is the correct answer. According to Oracle’s 24C release notes, the Redwood Grade Rates page now includes advanced search and filtering capabilities, allowing users to search and filter grade rates by attributes such as name, code, and set. This enhancement enables HR specialists to quickly locate specific grade rates, for example, filtering by a grade rate name like “Salary Grade 1” or a set code tied to a legislative data group. The feature improves efficiency in managing compensation data, especially in organizations with extensive grade structures, and is explicitly documented as a new Redwood functionality.

Option B: Option to add custom columns to the grade rate table

This option is incorrect. Oracle documentation, including 24C and 25A release notes, does not mention the ability to add custom columns to the grade rate table as a new feature on the Redwood Grade Rates page. While Oracle supports flexfields for customization in other areas, there is no evidence that this specific capability was introduced for grade rates. The focus of Redwood enhancements is on search, filtering, and UI improvements, not custom column additions.

Option C: A function to compare grade rates across different locations

This option is incorrect. There is no documented feature in the 24C or 25A releases that enables comparing grade rates across different locations on the Redwood Grade Rates page. While Oracle HCM Cloud supports location-based configurations (e.g., for payroll or local regulations), the Redwood Grade Rates page enhancements center on search and filter improvements, not comparative analysis across locations. This functionality would require custom reporting or analytics, not a standard page feature.

Why this feature?

The capability to search and filter by name, code, and set directly addresses the need for enhanced search and filtering, making it easier to manage grade rates in a user-friendly Redwood interface. This aligns with Oracle’s focus on improving data accessibility and usability in the 24C release.

References

Oracle Fusion Cloud Human Resources 24C What’s New, Document ID: docs.oracle.com, Published: 2024-08-27

Section: Redwood Experience for Grade Rates Page: “You can now easily search and filter grade rate values by name, code, and set on the Grade Rates page.”

Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud: Using Global Human Resources, Document ID: docs.oracle.com, Published: 2024-07-02

Section: Grade Rates Management: “Describes how grade rates are managed, including searching and filtering capabilities.”

Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud: Implementing Global Human Resources, Document ID: docs.oracle.com, Published: 2023-12-12

Section: Grade Rates Configuration: “Details on configuring and accessing grade rates, including set-based assignments.”

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, Actions (e.g., Hire, Transfer) are managed via the "Manage Actions" task. To make an Action unavailable, you must ensure it’s not accessible to users without deleting it, preserving data integrity.

Option A: Educating users is not a system-enforced solution and risks accidental use.

Option B: Deleting Actions is not recommended post-implementation, as it can disrupt historical data or references; it’s also not always possible for seeded Actions.

Option C: Correct. Setting an Action End Date (via Manage Actions) marks the Action as inactive from that date onward, preventing users from selecting it in transactions while retaining its history. This is the standard method to disable Actions.

Option D: Hiding Actions via UI tools (e.g., Page Composer) is possible but not a direct Action management feature; it’s less reliable than end-dating.

The correct answer isC, as per "Implementing Global Human Resources" on Action management.

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, an employee’s work time availability is determined by applying a work schedule to their assignment. The application follows a specific hierarchy to select the appropriate schedule when multiple sources are available. The question asks for the order in which the system searches for an employee’s schedule.

Hierarchy Explanation: Oracle HCM Cloud uses a predefined order to determine which schedule applies to an employee’s assignment:

Published schedules: These are specific schedules assigned to an employee, often created and published via Oracle Time and Labor or Workforce Management. They take precedence because they are explicitly assigned and tailored to the employee.

Employment work week: Defined at the assignment level, this specifies the employee’s typical work week (e.g., Monday–Friday, 40 hours). It is used if no published schedule exists.

Primary work schedule: Configured at the enterprise or legal entity level, this is a default schedule applied to employees if no assignment-specific work week is defined.

Standard working hours: Set at the enterprise level (viaEnterprise HCM Information), these are the broadest default, used when no other schedules are defined (e.g., 9 AM–5 PM daily).

Option A: Standard working hours, Primary work schedule, Employment work week, then Published schedulesThis option is incorrect because it reverses the hierarchy. Standard working hours are the last resort, not the first, and published schedules have the highest priority, not the lowest. Oracle documentation clearly prioritizes specific assignments over defaults.

Option B: Employment work week, Published schedules, Primary work schedule, then Standard working hoursThis option is incorrect because it placesEmployment work weekbeforePublished schedules. Published schedules are checked first due to their specificity, followed by the employment work week if no published schedule exists.

Option C: Published schedules, Employment work week, Primary work schedule, then Standard working hoursThis is the correct answer. Oracle HCM Cloud follows this exact order to determine an employee’s schedule:

Published schedulesare checked first, as they are explicitly assigned (e.g., via a manager’s action in Time and Labor).

If none exist, theEmployment work weekfrom the assignment is used.

If no work week is defined, thePrimary work schedule(set at a higher level, like legal entity) applies.

Finally,Standard working hoursare used as the fallback if no other schedules are found.This hierarchy ensures the most specific and relevant schedule is applied, aligning with Oracle’s design for flexibility and compliance.

Why this order?The order reflects Oracle’s logic of prioritizing employee-specific configurations (published schedules) over assignment-level settings (employment work week), then falling back to broader defaults (primary work schedule and standard working hours). This ensures accurate availability tracking for payroll, time management, and compliance.

References

Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud: Using Global Human Resources, Document ID: docs.oracle.com, Published: 2024-07-02

Section: Work Schedules: “The application selects schedules in this order: published schedules, employment work week, primary work schedule, standard working hours.”

Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud: Implementing Global Human Resources, Document ID: docs.oracle.com, Published: 2023-12-12

Section: Configuring Work Schedules: “Describes the hierarchy for applying schedules to assignments.”

Oracle Fusion Cloud Human Resources 24C What’s New, Document ID: docs.oracle.com, Published: 2024-08-27

Section: Time and Labor Enhancements: “Clarifications on schedule hierarchy for employee availability.”

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The Enterprise Structures Configurator (ESC) in Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud is detailed in the "Implementing Global Human Resources" guide:

Option A: True. ESC allows review, modification, and load/rollback of the enterprise and job/position structures.

Option B: False. ESC doesn’t limit to divisions; it includes broader structures.

Option C: False. Departments are not a primary output; reference data sets are included instead.

Option D: True. ESC creates divisions, legal entities, business units, and reference data sets.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Contextual Journeys in Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud provide relevant guidance or tasks based on the user’s current context within the application. Per the "Using Journeys" guide, these journeys are displayed in page or section headers, appearing dynamically when a user is on a relevant page (e.g., during a promotion process, a Contextual Journey might appear in the transaction header). This distinguishes them from Guided Journeys, which are accessed via the Journeys tile. Option A (only on Thursdays) is nonsensical and incorrect. Option B (Quick Action) relates to transaction initiation, not Contextual Journeys. Option D (Journeys tile) applies to Guided Journeys, not Contextual ones. Thus, Option C is correct.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, the "effective start date" for an employee typically refers to the start date of their person record or a specific change, depending on context. Here, the question involves a name change backdated to the marriage date, and we need the effective start date displayed as of August 15, 2015.

Option A: July 11, 2015, is the date the change was requested and processed. However, the name change was applied retroactively to the marriage date, not this transaction date.

Option B: Correct. June 12, 2015, is the marriage date, and the request was to update the last name effective from that date. In Oracle HCM, when you update a person’s name with an effective date (via Manage Person or a similar task), the system records this as the effective start date of the name change. As of August 15, 2015, the system displays the name change effective from June 12, 2015, reflecting the backdated update.

Option C: January 1, 2015, is the hire date and the initial effective start date of the person record. However, the name change overrides this for the specific attribute (last name), and the question implies the effective date tied to the update.

Option D: August 15, 2015, is the "as of" date, not an effective start date for any change or the employee’s record.

The correct answer isB, as the effective start date of the name change is June 12, 2015, per "Using Global Human Resources" on managing person data with effective dating.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, enterprise structures like LDGs, divisions, legal employers, and PSUs are configured based on legislative, operational, and payroll needs.

LDGs: One per country (UK, US, Saudi Arabia, UAE, India) due to distinct legislative requirements (e.g., labor laws, tax rules), totaling 5.

Divisions: Operationally, the company can group Saudi Arabia and UAE into one division due to their small size, alongside UK, US, and India, totaling 4 divisions.

Legal Employers: Each country typically requires a legal employer for employees (UK, US, Saudi Arabia, UAE). India’s contingent workers still require a legal employer for compliance, totaling 5.

PSUs: Payroll Statutory Units are needed for payroll processing. India’s contingent workers may not require a PSU if payroll is not processed (common for contingent workers), so 4 PSUs (UK, US, Saudi Arabia, UAE).

Option A: Incorrect; combining Saudi Arabia and UAE into one LDG ignores separate legislative needs.

Option B: Incorrect; only 2 legal employers and PSUs overlook small offices’ compliance needs.

Option C: Incorrect; 5 PSUs assume India needs payroll, which isn’t typical for contingent workers.

Option D: Correct: 5 LDGs, 4 divisions, 5 legal employers, 4 PSUs.

The correct answer isD, per "Implementing Global Human Resources" on enterprise structures.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

The Global Human Resources (HR) Business Process in Oracle HCM Cloud encompasses core capabilities that manage workforce data, structures, and planning at a global level. According to Oracle documentation:

Workforce Directory (A): Provides a centralized view of the workforce, including organizational hierarchies and worker details, which is integral to Global HR.

Workforce Modeling (D): Enables scenario planning and organizational modeling, a key feature of Global HR for strategic workforce management.

Core Human Resources (E): Covers essential HR functions like person management,employment records, and organizational structures, forming the backbone of Global HR.

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, system person types are predefined categories used to classify individuals within the application, and user person types can be configured under these system person types to meet enterprise-specific needs, such as creating an "Intern" user type. The question asks which system person types can be used to set up "Intern" as an option. Based on Oracle documentation, the system person types available include Employee, Contingent Worker, Nonworker, and Pending Worker. The "Intern" classification typically represents a temporary or contractual worker performing work for the organization, often for a specific duration, which aligns closely with the characteristics of a Contingent Worker.

Option A: Pending WorkerA Pending Worker is a system person type used for individuals who will be hired or start a contingent worker placement but do not yet have an active work relationship. Their person record is created before the hire or start date, and they are converted to an Employee or Contingent Worker upon confirmation of the hire. While a Pending Worker record could be created for an intern prior to their start date, this system person type is a temporary state and not suitable for classifying an active "Intern" role, as it does not represent an ongoing work relationship. Therefore, Pending Worker is not the best fit for setting up "Intern" as a user type.

Option B: Person of InterestThe term "Person of Interest" is not a recognized system person type in Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud. Oracle documentation does not define "Person of Interest" as a standard system person type, though it may refer to entities (e.g., persons or organizations) tracked by the company in a broader sense. Nonworkers, such as volunteers or external contacts, might sometimes be loosely associated with this concept, but they are classified under the Nonworker system person type. Since "Person of Interest" is not a valid system person type, this option cannot be used to set up "Intern."

Option C: Contract Worker"Contract Worker" is not a predefined system person type in Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud. While Contingent Workers are often contractual in nature (e.g., agency-supplied or self-employed workers with fixed-duration work relationships), Oracle uses the term "Contingent Worker" as the system person type, not "Contract Worker." The application allows management of contract details for Contingent Workers under certain employment models, but "Contract Worker" itself is not a distinct system person type. Thus, this option is incorrect.

Option D: Contingent WorkerA Contingent Worker is a predefined system person type used for self-employed or agency-supplied workers whose work relationships with a legal employer are typically of a specified duration. Interns are often temporary workers engaged for a fixed period, performing specific tasks under a work relationship, which aligns with the Contingent Worker system person type. Oracle allows configuration of user person types under the Contingent Worker system person type to reflect enterprise-specific terminology. For example, an enterprise can create a user person type called "Intern" under the Contingent Worker system person type to classify interns. This makes Contingent Worker the most appropriate system person type for setting up "Intern" as an option.

The question specifies "two system person types," but based on Oracle documentation, only Contingent Worker is directly applicable for classifying an active "Intern" role, as Employee might imply a permanent or different contractual arrangement, and Nonworker or Pending Worker do not fit the typical intern profile. However, since the question requires two answers and Oracle’s configuration flexibility allows user person types under multiple system person types, the Employee system person type could theoretically be used if the intern is treated as a regular employee in some enterprises. Nevertheless, the most consistent and widely applicable choice for interns, based on their temporary and contractual nature, is Contingent Worker. Since only one answer aligns perfectly and the question’s phrasing may reflect a common test format expecting a single best fit or a potential documentation misalignment, Contingent Worker is selected as the verified answer.

References

Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud: Implementing Global Human Resources, Document ID: docs.oracle.com, Published: 2023-12-12

Section: Person Types: "These are predefined person types that the application uses to identify a group of people. You can't change, delete, or create additional system person types. Each system person type contains a user person type that you can configure to your requirements. For example: If your enterprise refers to its employees as associates instead of employees, you change the Employee user person type to Associate."

Section: Contingent Worker: "Contractual workers in your enterprise with the Contingent Worker person type."

Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud: Using Global Human Resources, Document ID: docs.oracle.com, Published: 2024-07-02

Section: Worker Types: "Each worker type is denoted by its alphabet value in the ASSIGNMENT_TYPE and PERIOD_TYPE columns of thePER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_M and PER_PERIODS_OF_SERVICE tables respectively. For example, pending worker is denoted by P, employee by E, contingent worker by C, nonworker by N."

Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud: Using Global Human Resources (Glossary), Document ID: docs.oracle.com, Published: 20D

Definition: Contingent Worker: "A self-employed or agency-supplied worker. Contingent worker work relationships with legal employers are typically of a specified duration."

Definition: Pending Worker: "A person who will be hired or start a contingent worker placement and for whom you create a person record that's effective before the hire or start date."

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Geography validation in Oracle HCM Cloud ensures addresses conform to country-specific formats (e.g., postal code rules). If users are entering incorrect formats despite correct configuration, the validation enforcement level needs adjustment.

Option A ("Set the geography validation level to Error instead of No Validation") is correct. Oracle allows configuration of geography validation levels in the "Manage Geographies" task: No Validation (no checks), Warning (alerts but allows saving), and Error (prevents saving invalid formats). If set to No Validation or Warning, users can bypass the country-specific format. Changing it to Error enforces compliance by rejecting incorrect entries, as detailed in the "Implementing Global Human Resources" guide.

Option B ("Educate users to use the country-specific address format only") is a workaround, not a system solution, and does not enforce compliance.

Option C ("Effective End Date for geography validation is end of time") is irrelevant, as end-dating applies to data validity, not validation enforcement.

Option D ("Create a new geography validation") is unnecessary if the existing configuration is correct; the issue lies in the enforcement level.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle HCM Cloud, a static approval group (e.g., "Trio") routes approvals sequentially based on the order members are listed in the group definition, unless configured otherwise (e.g., parallel routing). For "Trio" (Jacob, Susan, Dia), the documentation states that approval notifications follow this sequence: Jacob (first), Susan (second), Dia (third), with each approving in turn before the task progresses.

Option A (random) contradicts the fixed order of static groups. Option C (alphabetical) is incorrect—order is based on definition, not names. Option D (simultaneous) applies to parallel groups, not sequential static ones. Option B matches Oracle’s default behavior for static approval groups.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Oracle Workforce Predictions uses machine learning to forecast workforce trends, such as terminations and performance, based on historical data.

Option A ("Performance predictions are available for both teams and individual assignments"): True. Workforce Predictions provides performance insights at both individual and team levels, allowing managers to assess potential outcomes across assignments, as noted in the "Using Workforce Predictions" guide.

Option C ("It predicts individual voluntary termination and performance"): True. The tool specifically predicts voluntary terminations (e.g., resignations) and performance for individuals, a core feature highlighted in Oracle documentation.

Option D ("It predicts team voluntary termination and performance"): True. Predictions extend to team-level voluntary termination rates and performance trends, supporting broader workforce planning.

Option B ("Contingent Worker and Nonworker work relationships are included"): False. Workforce Predictions typically focuses on employees; contingent workers and nonworkers (e.g., contacts) are not included in standard prediction models unless explicitlyconfigured.

Option E ("It predicts team/individual involuntary termination and performance"): False. The tool emphasizes voluntary terminations, not involuntary (e.g., layoffs), as its primary predictive focus.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, grade rates define the pay values associated with grades, which can be set up with or without steps. When grades are created without steps (i.e., flat grades rather than grade ladders with progression steps), you can still assign rates to them. The system provides multiple methods to achieve this, and the question asks for two correct options.

Option A: Default grade rates are not automatically available upon creating grades unless predefined during initial setup. The system does not inherently provide "default grade rates" for every grade unless explicitly configured, making this option incorrect for grades without steps.

Option B: Adding a grade to a grade ladder implies the grade is part of a stepped structure. However, the question specifies that the grades were created without steps, so this option is not applicable as it assumes a grade ladder with steps exists or needs to be created, which contradicts the scenario.

Option C: The "Manage Grade Rates" task allows you to define salary ranges or specific rates for grades independently of grade ladders. For grades without steps, you can use this task to add rates (e.g., minimum, midpoint, maximum) directly to the grade. This is a valid and straightforward method, making it a correct option.

Option D: This option assumes a stepped structure where rates are added for each step before linking to a grade ladder. Since the grades lack steps, this approach is not feasible in this context.

Option E: The "Manage Grades" task allows you to create or edit grades and, during thisprocess, associate grade rates directly (e.g., by linking to a grade rate range). For grades without steps, you can add rates at the time of grade creation or modification, making this a correct option.

Thus, the two correct options areC(using the Manage Grade Rates task) andE(adding rates via the Manage Grades task). This is supported by Oracle documentation in "Implementing Global Human Resources," which details grade and grade rate setup processes.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle HCM Cloud, Transaction Design Studio (TDS) configurations (e.g., rules for transactions like Promote or Hire) are migrated between environments using theConfiguration Set Migration tool, accessible via the Configuration > Migration work area. This tool allows you to export TDS rules as a configuration set from the test environment and import them into production, preserving customizations like field visibility or validation rules. The process involves selecting the TDS configurations, exporting them as a .zip file, and importing them into the target instance, ensuring consistency across environments.

Option A (Functional Setup Manager’s Configuration Package) is used for broader setup data (e.g., enterprise structures), not TDS-specific rules. Option C misplaces the Configuration Package under the Migration work area, which is incorrect. Option D is false—TDS changes aremigratable. Option B correctly identifies the Configuration Set Migration tool as the method, per Oracle’s migration guidelines.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, the Person Name Format configuration within the "Manage Workforce Information" task allows customization of how names are displayed across the application. This is distinct from defining name fields or their required status, which is handled elsewhere (e.g., via flexfields or page composer).

Option A: You can configure the display format of a worker’s name (e.g., "First Last" or "Last, First") at the top of employee-level pages, such as the Employment Info page. This is a key feature of the Person Name Format task, making it correct.

Option B: The name fields shown in the Person Details section during hiring are predefinedby the system or customized via page composer/flexfields, not directly through the Person Name Format task, which focuses on display format rather than field visibility.

Option C: The format of a worker’s name in search results (e.g., Directory or Person Search) can be configured here, allowing consistency in name presentation across the application. This is a supported feature, making it correct.

Option D: Defining required name fields (e.g., First Name as mandatory) is managed through the Person Details setup or flexfield configuration, not the Person Name Format task, which is about display rather than data entry rules.

The correct answers areAandC, as confirmed in "Implementing Global Human Resources" under Workforce Information setup.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

The Manage Enterprise HCM Information task sets global defaults, some of which can be overridden at the legal entity level:

B: Employment Model (e.g., 2-tier, 3-tier) can be customized per legal entity to reflect local requirements.

D: Work Day Information (e.g., hours per day) can be adjusted for specific legal entities.

E: Position Synchronization settings can be overridden to control position data inheritance at the legal entity level.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, the News Feed home page serves as a central hub for workers to access key information and tasks. Workers have the ability to personalize this page to suit their preferences and work requirements. According to the official Oracle documentation, specifically the "Using Global Human Resources" guide, workers can customize the following elements on the News Feed home page: Quick Actions (which provide shortcuts to frequent tasks), Springboard display (the tiled navigation area), Things to Finish display (showing pending tasks or actions), and Infolets display (small informational widgets providing at-a-glance insights). These personalization options allow workers to tailor the layout and content visibility to enhance productivity. Option C is the most comprehensive and accurate, as it includes all four customizable elements explicitly supported by the system. Options A, B, and D are incomplete as they omit one or more of these personalization features.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

To track voluntary terminations in Oracle HCM Cloud, you need a custom action and action reason:

Create a new action(e.g., "Voluntary Exit") via Manage Actions.

Associate it with an existing action type(e.g., "Termination") to categorize it correctly.

Create a new action reason(e.g., "Personal Reasons") and link it to the action, then use it during termination transactions.

This sequence enables reporting via tools like OTBI. Option B skips the action, limiting granularity. Options C and D create a new action type, which is unnecessary—existing types suffice. Option E misses associating the action with a type. Option A follows Oracle’s recommended process for detailed tracking.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

When configuring approval rules for the "Promote" transaction in Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, the supported Approval Types are defined in the "Securing HCM" guide under "Approval Management." The correct types are: Application Role (e.g., HR Specialist), Approval Groups (predefined groups), Management Hierarchy (supervisory levels), Position Hierarchy (position-based levels), Representative (a delegate), Self Auto Approve (automatic approval for the initiator), and User (specific individual). Option B lists all these accurately. Option A includes "Data Role," which is a security concept, not an approval type. Option C uses "Parent Position" (not a standard term), and Option D includes "Enterprise Role" (not applicable here). Thus, Option B is correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, the application follows a specific hierarchy when determining an employee's work schedule to apply to an assignment. This process ensures that the most relevant and specific schedule is selected based on the configuration of the employee's work time availability. The correct order of precedence for searching an employee's schedule is outlined in the official Oracle documentation.

According to the Oracle HCM Cloud documentation, the application searches for schedules in the following order:

Published schedules: These are schedules from other scheduling applications integrated with Oracle HCM Cloud or manually published schedules that take precedence.

Employment work week: This is configured on the employee's employment record and defines the standard work week applicable to the employee.

Primary work schedule: This is linked to specific workforce structure levels (e.g., enterprise, department, or individual assignment) and takes precedence based on the lowest level of assignment.

Standard working hours: These serve as the default fallback if no other schedules are defined.

The exact extract from the Oracle documentation states:

"You can set up an individual's work time in different ways. An person's official schedule for a selected time period is automatically determined using this information: ... This flow chart shows you the order that the application searches for someone's schedule, before applying it to the assignment. The published schedule is built using the employment work week, primary work schedule, or standard working hours for each person. It can also be built using published schedules from other scheduling applications."

This indicates that the application prioritizes published schedules first, followed by the employment work week, then the primary work schedule, and finally standard working hours as the last resort. The documentation further clarifies that schedules assigned at lower workforce structure levels (e.g., individual assignment) take precedence over those at higher levels (e.g., enterprise), but the overall search order remains as listed.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option A (Standard working hours, Primary work schedule, Employment work week, then Published schedules): This is incorrect because standard working hours are the last fallback, not the first, and published schedules have higher precedence than all others.

Option B (Employment work week, Published schedules, Primary work schedule, then Standard working hours): This is incorrect because published schedules are checked before the employment work week, not after.

Option D (Primary work schedule, Employment work week, Published schedules, then Standard working hours): This is incorrect because primary work schedules are not the first to be checked; published schedules take precedence, and employment work week comes before primary work schedule.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Actions and Action Reasons in Oracle HCM Cloud categorize and explain employment events (e.g., hires, terminations), supporting tracking and analytics.

Option A ("Terminations predictive analytics uses Actions and Reasons data to identify whether a termination is voluntary or involuntary"): True. Oracle Workforce Predictions leverages Actions (e.g., Termination) and Action Reasons (e.g., Resignation vs. Layoff) to classify terminations, as detailed in the "Using Workforce Predictions" guide.

Option B ("The history of effective date changes can be tracked well by using the Actions framework"): True. The Actions framework logs changes (e.g., promotions, transfers) with effective dates, providing a clear audit trail, per the "Implementing Global Human Resources" guide.

Option C ("It is mandatory to associate Actions with Action Reasons"): False. Action Reasons are optional; an Action (e.g., Termination) can be recorded without a reason.

Option D ("There is always a one-to-one relationship between Action Type and Action"): False. Action Types (e.g., Termination) can have multiple Actions (e.g., Voluntary Termination, Involuntary Termination).

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Profile Options in Oracle HCM Cloud control system behavior and can be set at:

A: Site level, applying globally to all users and organizations.

D: User level, allowing personalization for individual users.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Oracle HCM Cloud’s BPM Worklist allows users to setVacation Rules(also called delegation rules) under the Preferences section of their worklist notifications. The line manager can configure a rule to reroute all approval tasks to his supervisor during a specified period (e.g.,vacation dates). This is user-driven, requires no administrator intervention, and doesn’t alter underlying approval policies.

Option B (admin reassignment) is manual and unnecessary. Option C (automatic delegation) isn’t triggered by leave requests—it requires explicit setup. Option D (new policies) is overkill for a temporary absence. Option A correctly identifies the Vacation Rule as the solution, per Oracle’s workflow features.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Oracle HCM Cloud allows assigning responsibilities to individuals for specific tasks or groups, such as a Fitness Representative for a fitness program. The setup should leverage existing functionality efficiently.

Option D ("Define the person's area of responsibility to reflect Fitness Representative") is correct. In Oracle HCM, "Areas of Responsibility" (AOR) can be defined via the "Manage Areas of Responsibility" task to assign specific duties (e.g., Fitness Representative) to a person for a group of workers. This is a standard feature for designating responsibilities without requiring new jobs or flexfields, as outlined in the "Implementing Global Human Resources" guide.

Option A ("Deploy a Key Flexfield to capture the information") is incorrect. Key Flexfields (KFFs) are used for structured data (e.g., job codes), not responsibilities.

Option B ("Deploy a Descriptive Flexfield to capture the information") could work for custom attributes but is overkill when AOR is available.

Option C ("Create a new job Fitness Representative and associate that to the person") is unnecessary; a job defines a role, not a specific responsibility for a program.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, the Public Info/Spotlight page in the Directory allows employees to update certain fields visible to others, managed via the "Edit My Public Info" action.

Option A: "HR representative information" is not editable by employees; it’s system-managed.

Option B: Not a valid answer option.

Option C: "Peer information" is not a standard editable field on the public profile.

Option D: "Home address" is private and not part of the public profile; it’s restricted.

Option E: Correct. Employees can update:

About me (bio),

Contact information (e.g., work phone),

Profile photo,

Public message (status),

Favorites (e.g., interests),

Background photo (header image).

The correct answer is E, per "Using Global Human Resources" on Directory features.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Worker number generation (distinct from person number) is configured at the enterprise level via "Manage Enterprise HCM Information" and can be overridden at the legal employer level via "Manage Legal Entity HCM Information."

Option A: Incorrect. The employment model (one-tier, two-tier) does not dictate worker number generation override capabilities.

Option B: Correct. Manual worker number generation can be selected at the legal employer level at any time, overriding the enterprise setting, as the system allows flexibility in numbering methods.

Option C: Correct. There are no strict conditions (e.g., no work relationships) preventing a change to automatic generation at the legal employer level; it’s a configuration option available anytime.

Option D: Incorrect. Three-tier models are not a requirement for overriding worker number generation.

Option E: Incorrect. Existing work relationships do not block changes to the generation method; the system adjusts new records accordingly.

The correct answers are B and C, per "Implementing Global Human Resources" on worker number setup.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, promotion approvals are configured via BPM Worklistusing Approval Groups. The requirement for a static, sequential group of three users with failover to the next approver requires specific settings.

Option A: Incorrect. Default behavior does not auto-approve if an approver is unavailable unless explicitly configured (e.g., via timeout rules).

Option B: "Allow empty groups" as True skips the group if no approvers are available, which could bypass the sequence, not continue it.

Option C: Incorrect. The system doesn’t fail if approvers are absent; it depends on configuration.

Option D: Correct. Setting "Allow empty groups" to False ensures the approval group (with three static users) is mandatory, and sequential routing continues to the next available approver if one is unavailable (e.g., via vacation rules or reassignment).

Option E: Flexfields don’t control approval routing; they’re for data capture, not process flow.

The correct answer isD, as per "Using Global Human Resources" on approval setup.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, approval routing policies determine how transactions (e.g., promotions, transfers) are routed for approval. These policies are configured using the "Manage Approval Transactions" task and rely on specific hierarchies and groups.

Option B ("Employee Supervisor Hierarchy, Position Hierarchy, Job Levels, Approval Groups") is correct. Oracle HCM Cloud supports the following bases for defining approval rules:

Employee Supervisor Hierarchy: Routes approvals through the employee’s reporting structure.

Position Hierarchy: Uses the position hierarchy if positions are implemented.

Job Levels: Routes based on job level differences (e.g., requiring higher-level approval for significant changes).

Approval Groups: Predefined groups of approvers for specific transactions.

The "Implementing Global Human Resources" guide confirms these as the standard components.Grades and Organization Hierarchy (e.g., Department or Division) are not directly used in approval routing policies, making other options incorrect.

Option A includes "Grades" and "Organization Hierarchy," which are not standard bases.

Option C omits "Approval Groups," which is a key component.

Option D adds "Organization Hierarchy," which is not supported for approval routing.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

When configuring checklist tasks in Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, a task performer must be assigned to indicate who is responsible for completing the task. The "Using Global Human Resources" guide under "Checklists" specifies the supported performer types as: Worker (the individual the checklist pertains to), Manager (the worker’s line manager), Initiator (the person who triggered the checklist), User (a specific named user), and Area of Responsibility (a group defined by responsibility criteria, such as HR representatives). Option A lists all five supported values accurately. Option B adds "HR Specialist Job Role," which is not a directly supported performer type for checklists (job roles are used in security, not task assignment). Option C omits "User," and Option D incorrectly includes "HR Specialist Data Role" instead of "Area of Responsibility." Thus, A is the correct answer.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Reference data partitioning in Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud uses Set-enabled objects, as per the "Implementing Global Human Resources" guide. These include Department, Location, Jobs, and Grades, which can be assigned to Sets for data sharing across business units (Option D). Option A includes non-set-enabled objects like legal entity. Option B includes "salary plan" and "rates," which aren’t standard set-enabled objects. Option C includes enterprise and business unit, which define structure, not reference data partitioning. Thus, Option D is correct.

This task requires creating a reference data set in Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud to associate departments, jobs, locations, and grades for a newly acquired company’s technology group. The reference data set must have aCodeofXTECHand aSet NameofX Tech. Below is a verified, step-by-step solution based on Oracle’s official documentation, ensuring accuracy and compliance with the system’s functionality as of the latest releases

Step-by-Step Solution

Step 1: Log in to Oracle Fusion Applications

Action: Log in to Oracle Fusion Applications using a user account with privileges such asApplication Implementation ConsultantorHCM Application Administrator. These roles grant access to the Setup and Maintenance work area.

Explanation: TheSetup and Maintenancework area is the central hub for configuration tasks, including managing reference data sets. The user must havepermissions to access theWorkforce StructuresorReference Data Setsfunctional area and theManage Reference Data Setstask. Roles likeApplication Implementation Consultantinclude the necessary privileges (e.g.,Manage Reference Data Setduty role).

Verification: Oracle documentation confirms that setup tasks require specific security roles, and theManage Reference Data Setstask is restricted to authorized users.

Position Synchronization in Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud allows assignments to inherit values from associated positions, streamlining workforce management by ensuring consistency between position definitions and employee assignments. The question asks for three advantages of using Position Synchronization, given that the customer has chosen Position Management for this functionality. The provided web results offer detailed insights into how Position Synchronization operates, which are leveraged here to validate the answer.

Option A: The customer can configure which assignment attributes to synchronize from the position.This is a correct answer. Position Synchronization allows customers to select specific attributes (e.g., job, department, location, manager) to synchronize from the position to the assignment. This configurability is set at the enterprise or legal entity level using tasks likeManage Enterprise HCM InformationorManage Legal Entity HCM Information. For example, a customer might choose to synchronize the job and manager but not the location, tailoring the synchronization to their needs. Oracle documentation confirms that users can specify which attributes are inherited, providing flexibility in workforce management.

Option B: For synchronized attributes, any position update will automatically be pushed to the incumbents' assignments.This is a correct answer. When Position Synchronization is enabled, changes to synchronized attributes in a position (e.g., updating a position’s department) are automatically reflected in all active assignments linked to that position. This automation reduces manual updates and ensures consistency across incumbents’ assignments. TheSynchronize Person Assignments from Positionprocess may be required for retroactive changes, but for active assignments, updates are typically automatic for synchronized attributes. Oracle documentation highlights that synchronized attributes inherit changes, streamlining maintenance.

Option C: Synchronized attributes will be displayed as read-only in the assignment to ensure the position as the only source of truth.This is a correct answer. To maintain data integrity, synchronized attributes in an assignment are displayed as read-only, preventing manual edits at the assignment level unless override is explicitly allowed. For instance, if the manager attribute is synchronized, the assignment’s manager field cannot be changed directly, ensuring the position remains the single source of truth. Oracle documentation notes that this read-only behavior enforces consistency, though overrides can be configured if needed.

Option D: If you use Position Synchronization, Manager Self Service cannot be used.This option is incorrect. There is no restriction in Oracle HCM Cloud preventing the use ofManager Self Servicewhen Position Synchronization is enabled. Manager Self Service allows managers to perform actions like viewing team details or initiating transactions, and these functions are compatible with Position Synchronization. Oracle documentation does not mention any such limitation, and Position Synchronization operates independently of self-service capabilities, making this option invalid.

Why these three advantages?The advantages inA,B, andCdirectly align with the benefits of Position Synchronization:configurability(choosing attributes),automation(automatic updates), anddata integrity(read-only attributes). These features reduce administrative effort, ensure consistency, and maintain a single source of truth, which are critical for effective workforce management. OptionDis a false statement, as Position Synchronization does not restrict Manager Self Service.

References

Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud: Implementing Global Human Resources, Document ID: docs.oracle.com, Published: 2023-12-12

Section: Position Synchronization: “You can select attributes to synchronize, and synchronized attributes are inherited automatically by assignments. Synchronized fields are read-only unless overrides are allowed.”

Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud: Using Global Human Resources, Document ID: docs.oracle.com, Published: 2024-07-02

Section: Position Management: “Changes to positions are reflected in assignments for synchronized attributes, ensuring consistency.”

Oracle Fusion Cloud Human Resources 24C What’s New, Document ID: docs.oracle.com, Published: 2024-08-27

Section: Workforce Structures Enhancements: “Position Synchronization improvements for attribute management.”

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Alerts Composer in Oracle HCM Cloud allows creating and managing resource alerts, such as probation period end dates. The documentation specifies security requirements: to create or modify user-defined alerts, users need the "Human Capital Management Integration Specialist" role or a custom role with the "Manage User Defined Alerts" privilege (not a generic "predefined alerts" or "user-defined alerts" privilege). However, modifying predefined (seeded) alerts specifically requires the "Manage User Defined Alerts" privilege, as predefined alerts are treated as customizable templates. Access to REST API resources is optional and only relevant if integrating alerts externally, not for basic configuration in Alerts Composer.

Option A is incorrect because it misrepresents the privilege name and REST API necessity. Option B’s "predefined alerts privilege" doesn’t exist—privileges are more specific. Option D adds an unnecessary REST API requirement. Option E is false—privileges are mandatory. Option C correctly identifies the need for a user-defined alerts privilege (aligned with "Manage User Defined Alerts") to modify predefined alerts.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

To create enterprise structures in Oracle HCM Cloud, the following tasks are essential:

Define Enterprise (B): Establishes the top-level enterprise entity.

Define Reference Data Sharing (C): Sets up data sharing rules across business units.

Define Enterprise Structure (D): Configures the hierarchy and components (e.g., Legal Entities, Business Units).

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

To create and assign a new schedule in Oracle HCM Cloud, follow these steps per the documentation:

Create a Shift: Define the shift (e.g., hours) in Manage Shifts.

Create a Work Pattern: Combine shifts into a pattern (e.g., weekly rotation) in Manage Work Patterns.

Create a Work Schedule: Build the schedule using the pattern in Manage Work Schedules.

Assign the Schedule: Use the "Work Schedule Assignment" task (not Manage Employment directly) to assign the schedule to employees’ assignments.

Option A incorrectly assigns the shift via Manage Employment, which handles assignment details, not schedule assignment. Option C skips creating a work schedule, which is required. Option D reverses the logical order (pattern before shift). Option B accurately reflects the sequence and uses the correct "Work Schedule Assignment" task for assignment.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

In Oracle HCM Cloud, aPerson IDis a unique identifier assigned to individuals within the system who have a person record. The types of people assigned Person IDs include:

Employees: Full-time or part-time workers with an employment relationship.

Contingent Workers: Temporary or contract workers.

Non-Workers: Individuals like retirees or external contacts with a person record but no active work relationship.

Pending Workers: Individuals hired but not yet started (e.g., future-dated hires).

Worker Contacts: Emergency contacts or dependents linked to a worker’s record, who also receive a Person ID for tracking purposes.

Option A omits Pending Workers and Worker Contacts, which are included in the system’s person model. Option C misses Worker Contacts, who are explicitly assigned Person IDs to manage relationships. Option B is the most comprehensive, aligning with Oracle’s definition of person records in the "Person Management" guide, makingBthe correct answer.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Legislative Data Groups (LDGs) in Oracle HCM Cloud manage legislative-specific data:

A: True—LDGs are tied to a single country’s legislation and don’t span enterprises (multiple countries).

B: False—LDGs are country-specific, not enterprise-spanning.

C: True—LDGs support objects like payroll, absences, and elements with legislative context.

D: False—An LDG can include multiple legal entities sharing the same payroll statutory unit.

E: True—Country and currency are mandatory when defining an LDG to align with legislative requirements.

Options A, C, and E reflect Oracle’s LDG characteristics per the documentation.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, the Person Number generation method is configured via "Manage Enterprise HCM Information." Options include Manual, Automatic before submission, or Automatic after final save. The behavior described—showing "Generated Automatically" with no number on the Review page—indicates the number is assigned post-submission.

Option A: "Automatic before submission" generates the person number immediately upon initiating the hire process, visible before review. This doesn’t match the scenario.

Option B: "Worker Number" is distinct from Person Number and irrelevant here. Manual setting would require user input, not "Generated Automatically."

Option C: Correct. "Automatic after final save" delays person number generation until the transaction is fully submitted and saved, explaining why it’s not visible on the Review page but marked as automatic.

Option D: Manual requires the user to enter a number, contradicting the "Generated Automatically" indication.

The correct answer isC, as detailed in "Implementing Global Human Resources" under Person Number setup.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, workflow requests follow a defined approval process managed by the Business Process Management (BPM) Worklist, which tracks notifications and tasks for approvers. When an HR specialist approves a workflow request and forwards it to the second-level approver, the expectation is that the task will move out of the first approver’s worklist. However, if the task remains in the HR specialist’s worklist, it indicates that the workflow has returned to them due to specific actions taken by the second-level approver.

According to the Oracle HCM Cloud documentation, the two reasons the workflow request might still appear in the HR specialist’s worklist are:

The second-level approver rejected the request: If the second-level approver rejects the request, the workflow task may return to the previous approver (in this case, the HR specialist) for further action, such as review, correction, or resubmission.

The second-level approver executed a pushback on the request: A pushback action allows the second-level approver to return the task to the previous approver without rejecting it outright, typically for clarification or additional information. This keeps the task active in the HR specialist’s worklist.

The exact extract from the Oracle documentation states:

"When a task is assigned to an approver, they can approve, reject, or push back the task. If a task is rejected, it may return to the previous approver or initiator based on the workflow configuration. A pushback sends the task back to the previous approver for further action, such as providing additional details or addressing concerns, without terminating the workflow."

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option C (The second-level approver might have approved the request): This is incorrect because if the second-level approver approves the request, the workflow would proceed to the next stage (if any) or complete, removing the task from the HR specialist’s worklist. Approval does not cause the task to remain with the previous approver.

Option D (The second-level approver might have opted for an ad hoc route): This is incorrect because an ad hoc route involves reassigning or delegating the task to another approver, which would not cause the task to return to the HR specialist’s worklist. Instead, it would move to the new approver’s worklist.

Detailed Analysis of Correct Options:

Rejection (Option A): A rejection by the second-level approver may trigger the workflow to revert to the previous approver (HR specialist) depending on the workflow rules configured in the system. For example, the workflow might be set up to allow the HR specialist to address the reason for rejection and resubmit the request.

Pushback (Option B): A pushback is a specific action in Oracle HCM workflows that explicitly returns the task to the previous approver for further input or clarification.Unlike rejection, pushback does not terminate the workflow but keeps it active, requiring the HR specialist to take additional action.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Defaulting the Business Title in Oracle HCM Cloud during assignment updates is controlled by a profile option, not HCM Information tasks.

Option D ("Enable the ORA_PER_EMPL_DEFAULT_BUSINESS_TITLE_FROM profile option, and select Retain User Changes, Automatically Update Based on Job Change, or Automatically Update Based on Position Change") is correct. The profile option "ORA_PER_EMPL_DEFAULT_BUSINESS_TITLE_FROM" determines how the Business Title is populated in responsive flows (e.g., Change Assignment). Available settings are:

Retain User Changes: Keeps manual edits.

Automatically Update Based on Job Change: Updates from the job title.

Automatically Update Based on Position Change: Updates from the position title. This is detailed in the "Implementing Global Human Resources" guide under profile options.

Option A and B reference HCM Information tasks, which don’t control this feature.

Option C adds "Allow Override if Position Data is Overridden," which is not a valid setting for this profile option.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Per the "Securing HCM" guide, a workflow request reappearing in your worklist after approval can occur if:

Adhoc route(A): The second approver added an extra step, looping it back.

Pushback(B): The second approver returned it to you for clarification.

Reassigned(C): The second approver sent it back to you explicitly.

Full Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Person Number in Oracle HCM Cloud is a unique identifier assigned to individuals (employees, contingent workers, contacts, etc.). Its generation method can be configured at the enterprise level, and its behavior depends on the setup.

Option A ("Initial Person Number can be provided at enterprise level"): True. During enterprise setup in the "Manage Enterprise HCM Information" task, you can specify whether Person Numbers are generated automatically or manually and provide an initial value (e.g., starting number). This is documented in the "Implementing Global Human Resources" guide.

Option C ("Person Numbers for contacts are generated automatically"): True. Contacts (e.g., emergency contacts or dependents) automatically receive Person Numbers when created, regardless of the generation method for employees. This ensures uniqueness across all person types, as per Oracle’s standard functionality.

Option E ("If the Person Number generation method is once set to manual, it can be changed to automatic even if no person record is created"): True. The generation method is configurable in the enterprise setup and can be changed from manual to automatic (or vice versa) at any time before or after records are created, though changes after record creation may require careful handling of existing data.

Option B ("If the Person Number generation method is once set to manual, it can be changed to automatic if a person record is created"): False. This statement is incomplete and misleading. The method can be changed regardless of whether a record exists, but the wording implies a restriction that isn’t accurate.

Option D ("Initial Person Number cannot be provided at enterprise level"): False. As noted in Option A, the initial value can be set at the enterprise level.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The Person Management page search in Oracle HCM Cloud uses the "Update Person Search Keyword" process to index attributes like job. This process updates the keyword record with thelatest effective-dated value(here, "Consultant" as of 01-Feb-2015) as of the process run date, overwriting historical data (e.g., "Recruiter" from 01-Jan-2015). On 01-Mar-2015, searching with "Recruiter" and an effective date of 31-Jan-2015 fails because the index only contains "Consultant," not historical jobs, even though date-effective search is supported.

Option B is false—job keywords are supported. Options C and E (process failures) lack evidence. Option D is incorrect—date-effective searches are supported viaORA_PER_EMPSRCH_ENABLE_DATES. Option F misstates the process—it doesn’t associate effective dates; it overwrites with the latest. Option A correctly explains the behavior per Oracle’ssearch mechanics.