SSM SSM (6.0) - SAFe Scrum Master Practice 6.0 Questions and Answers

One benefit of PI Planning is that it allows for faster decision-making by bringing together all the members of the Agile Release Train (ART) and the relevant stakeholders in a face-to-face (or virtual) event. PI Planning provides an opportunity for the ART to align on a common vision and mission, review the business context and priorities, identify and resolve dependencies and risks, and commit to a realistic and achievable plan for the next Program Increment (PI). By having everyone involved in the planning process, the ART can leverage the collective knowledge and expertise of the participants, reduce ambiguity and uncertainty, and make informed and timely decisions that support the delivery of value to the customers.

According to SAFe®, the Iteration Retrospective is a key event that enables relentless improvement, one of the pillars of the SAFe House of Lean. The purpose is to reflect on the previous iteration and identify what went well, what didn’t, and what can be improved.

An essential outcome of this meeting is a set of actionable improvement items that can be added to the team backlog. These items are often captured as improvement Stories, ensuring that process enhancements are visible, prioritized, and implemented in the next iteration.

From SAFe guidance:

“The retrospective concludes with actionable improvement items added to the backlog. These items should be implemented in subsequent iterations to improve performance.”

Therefore, the correct answer is D. Ensure the event ends with actionable improvement items for the backlog, as it ensures continuous learning and measurable improvement.

In SAFe®, Iteration Planning is the event where the team determines how much work they can commit to for the upcoming iteration and aligns on the iteration goal. The recommended first step of Iteration Planning is to establish team capacity.

By identifying the available capacity (in person-days or story points) considering holidays, time off, or other commitments, the team ensures realistic planning and avoids overcommitment. This forms the foundation for selecting appropriate backlog items that fit within available capacity.

From SAFe guidance:

“Iteration Planning starts with establishing the team’s capacity for the upcoming iteration. This ensures that the team commits to a realistic amount of work based on their availability.”

Therefore, the correct answer is D. Establish capacity, as it is the first and most critical step in effective iteration planning.

A servant leader empowers team members to grow by creating opportunities for learning and collaboration. One effective technique is to pair team members together to complete new or unique work. This practice promotes knowledge sharing, builds confidence, and helps develop T-shaped skills, which increase team flexibility and resilience.

Pairing fosters mentorship and shared ownership of outcomes, aligning with SAFe’s emphasis on continuous learning culture and relentless improvement. Instead of assigning rigid development paths or confining people to comfort zones, servant leaders enable self-directed learning and encourage experimentation.

From SAFe guidance:

“Servant leaders grow others by providing opportunities for learning, pairing, and collaboration. They help individuals reach their potential by empowering them to take on new challenges.”

Therefore, the correct answer is A. Pair team members together to complete new or unique work, as this directly supports team member growth and a culture of learning.

One of the characteristics of high-performing teams is having fun with the work and with each other. According to SAFe, high-performing teams enjoy their work and have a positive team spirit. They celebrate their achievements and learn from their failures. They also have a strong sense of camaraderie and trust, which fosters collaboration, innovation, and continuous improvement12.

In SAFe®, the Inspect and Adapt (I&A) event is critical for enabling relentless improvement at the Agile Release Train (ART) level. It consists of three parts: the PI System Demo, quantitative and qualitative measurement, and a problem-solving workshop.

An important anti-pattern during I&A is when not enough preparation goes into the quantitative and qualitative measurement section. Without proper preparation—such as collecting team metrics, business value achievement data, and feedback—the event loses its empirical foundation. Teams may focus only on anecdotal issues instead of addressing measurable trends or root causes.

The I&A relies on meaningful metrics to guide discussion, measure performance, and identify systemic improvements. Poor preparation in this section weakens the effectiveness of the event and prevents data-driven decision-making.

From SAFe guidance:

“The I&A event requires preparation of quantitative and qualitative data. Insufficient preparation reduces the quality of the session and limits learning.”

Thus, the correct answer is D. Not enough preparation goes into the quantitative and qualitative measurement section.

In the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe®), sustainable pace and predictable delivery are essential for high-performing Agile teams. An important signal that a team may be overcommitting to work is when team members begin pulling in work from future Iterations before completing the committed iteration backlog.

This behavior is an anti-pattern because it disrupts the cadence and predictability of the Agile Release Train (ART). It also undermines flow and focus, spreading the team’s effort too thin across multiple iterations and reducing quality. Overcommitting leads to burnout, missed commitments, and lower morale, which negatively affect the team’s long-term velocity and dependability.

According to SAFe:

“Teams should plan only as much work as they can complete within the iteration based on historical velocity and available capacity. Pulling work from future iterations indicates overcommitment or lack of focus on the planned goals.”

Therefore, C. Team members are pulling in work from future Iterations is the correct answer—it’s a clear symptom of overcommitment and poor iteration discipline.

A constructive IP Iteration is one of the recommended practices for Scrum Masters/Team Coaches to help teams avoid burnout, address technical debt, and foster innovation. An IP Iteration is a unique, dedicated iteration that occurs every PI and provides an estimating buffer for meeting PI Objectives and dedicated time for innovation, continuing education, PI Planning, and Inspect and Adapt events. During the IP Iteration, teams can work on activities such as hackathons, research and design, spikes, refactoring, automation, training, and other improvement initiatives that are difficult to fit into a continuous, incremental value delivery pattern. An IP Iteration also allows teams to prepare for and participate in the PI Planning and Inspect and Adapt events, which are essential for alignment, collaboration, and learning across the ART. A constructive IP Iteration can improve the predictability and flow of value delivery, increase employee engagement and satisfaction, enhance the agility and resilience of the teams, and create a competitive advantage for the enterprise.

One way uncommitted objectives help Agile Teams make a plan for the PI is that they maintain the predictability of achieving the objectives. Uncommitted objectives are PI objectives that are not included in the team’s commitment or counted against teams in the ART predictability measure. They are used to identify work that can be variable within the scope of a PI, such as stretch goals, spikes, innovation, or exploration1 Uncommitted objectives help improve the predictability of delivering business value since they allow the team to adjust their scope based on the actual progress and feedback during the PI. They also provide the team with some flexibility and capacity to respond to changing needs and expectations, as well as to pursue learning and improvement opportunities12 

In the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe®), Scrum Masters or Team Coaches (SM/TCs) support their teams by making work visible and ensuring transparency around progress and delivery. One of the most effective tools for visualizing team delivery is the Burn-up Chart.

A Burn-up Chart shows progress toward the completion of work over time. It tracks the amount of work completed compared to the total scope, helping teams and stakeholders visualize how close they are to meeting iteration or PI objectives. This visualization enables data-driven discussions, supports predictability, and helps identify delivery risks early.

While other metrics like Cycle Time or Cumulative Flow Diagrams are valuable for measuring flow and efficiency, the Burn-up Chart specifically visualizes delivery progress.

From SAFe guidance:

“Teams use burn-up charts to visualize progress toward the goal and communicate delivery status. They enable transparency and support empirical planning and adaptation.”

Therefore, the correct answer is B. Burn-up chart—it is the primary visualization tool for tracking and communicating team delivery progress.

According to the SAFe® (Scaled Agile Framework) guidelines, an effective Scrum Master or Team Coach (SM/TC) exhibits several key traits that enable them to support Agile Teams effectively. One of the most emphasized characteristics is the ability to navigate conflict constructively.

A "conflict navigator" refers to someone who helps the team identify and work through disagreements in a productive way. Rather than avoiding or suppressing conflict, a skilled Scrum Master uses it as an opportunity to surface issues, enhance team learning, and drive continuous improvement. This aligns with the servant-leadership stance encouraged both in SAFe and the Scrum Guide.

While traits like being charismatic or ambitious may be personally beneficial, they are not explicitly listed in SAFe or Scrum literature as core attributes for Scrum Masters. Similarly, competitiveness could actually contradict the collaborative, team-focused nature of Agile frameworks.

From the SAFe® Scrum Master role description:

“Effective Scrum Masters are servant leaders who display characteristics such as active listening, empathy, persuasion, and conflict facilitation.”

This highlights the importance of conflict facilitation, making “Conflict navigator” the correct answer.

For full reference, see:

???? SAFe Scrum Master Role – Scaled Agile Framework

In the context of SAFe® and Agile Team dynamics, healthy conflict is a defining characteristic of a high-performing team. It allows members to openly challenge ideas, explore different perspectives, and arrive at better decisions collectively.

Healthy conflict is based on mutual respect and a shared commitment to team goals. It is different from destructive conflict—rather than creating division, it fosters creativity, innovation, and stronger collaboration. When teams are psychologically safe and can engage in constructive debate, they can refine solutions and build consensus faster.

SAFe emphasizes servant leadership and coaching behaviors that enable such open communication:

“High-performing Agile Teams engage in healthy conflict, where diverse viewpoints are explored and disagreements are resolved constructively, leading to better decisions and shared commitment.”

While trust, clear goals, and decision-making are also vital attributes, healthy conflict specifically addresses how teams can manage differing opinions productively, making it the correct answer.

One recommended practice for Scrum Masters/Team Coaches when coaching teams on presenting a draft plan at PI Planning is to align on how the team will answer questions about their proposed objectives. This practice helps the team to prepare for the feedback and input they will receive from the business owners, product management, and other teams and stakeholders during the draft plan review. The team should agree on who will present the objectives, how they will explain the business value and technical feasibility, and how they will handle any objections or concerns. The team should also rehearse their presentation and anticipate potential questions and scenarios. By aligning on how to answer questions, the team can increase their confidence and clarity, and demonstrate their commitment and alignment to the vision and goals of the ART.

An essential coaching technique for Scrum Masters/Team Coaches in SAFe® is asking powerful questions. Instead of providing direct solutions, effective Scrum Masters guide the team toward self-discovery and collaborative problem-solving.

Powerful questions are open-ended, thought-provoking inquiries that stimulate deeper reflection and creative thinking. This approach aligns with the servant-leader mindset, enabling team members to take ownership of their challenges and develop collective accountability.

Examples include:

“What options have we not yet considered?”

“What’s the smallest next step we could take?”

“What’s blocking our progress, and how might we remove it together?”

From SAFe guidance:

“Scrum Masters and Team Coaches enable teams to find their own solutions by asking powerful questions rather than providing answers. This encourages collaboration and fosters a culture of continuous learning.”

Therefore, the correct answer is A. Asking powerful questions, as it directly supports self-management and team empowerment.

One anti-pattern that emerges when teams do not spend enough time refining the backlog is that they enter new Iterations without enough Stories prepared. This can result in several negative consequences, such as: 123

The team may struggle to plan and commit to the Iteration Goals, as they lack clarity, feasibility, and testability of the Stories.

The team may face delays, rework, and waste, as they encounter unanticipated dependencies, risks, or technical issues during the Iteration.

The team may deliver low-quality or incomplete Stories, as they rush to meet the Iteration deadlines or compromise on the Definition of Done.

The team may lose focus, alignment, and motivation, as they work on ambiguous or unrealistic Stories that do not deliver value to the customers or the organization.

To avoid this anti-pattern, the team should dedicate sufficient time and effort to refine the backlog on a regular basis, preferably every Iteration123 Backlog Refinement is an ongoing process where the team collaborates with the Product Owner and other stakeholders to review, split, prioritize, and estimate the Stories in the Team Backlog4 One of the main objectives of Backlog Refinement is to ensure that the Stories are ready for Iteration Planning, which means they are clear, feasible, testable, and small enough to be completed in a single Iteration2 By doing so, the team can improve the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of their work, as well as deliver value to the customers and the organization

An anti-pattern is a behavior that seems helpful but actually undermines Agile principles. In the context of Iteration Retrospectives, one anti-pattern for Scrum Masters or Team Coaches is focusing only on what to improve and not on what to preserve.

Effective retrospectives are balanced—they highlight both what went well and what can be improved. Recognizing and reinforcing successful practices helps the team sustain productive behaviors while targeting specific areas for change. Ignoring positive aspects can lower morale and overlook practices that contribute to success.

From SAFe guidance:

“Teams use the retrospective to discuss what went well, what didn’t, and what actions to take. Recognizing what to preserve reinforces effective team habits and strengths.”

Therefore, the correct answer is B. They focus only on what to improve and not what to preserve, as this behavior disrupts balanced reflection and continuous improvement.

One practice Scrum Masters/Team Coaches can use to facilitate conflict management is to enforce working agreements. Working agreements are a set of guidelines that define how a team wants to work together, communicate, and collaborate. They are created by the team members themselves and reflect their shared values, norms, and expectations. Working agreements can help prevent or reduce conflicts by establishing clear boundaries, roles, and responsibilities, as well as by promoting respect, trust, and transparency among team members. Working agreements can also help resolve conflicts by providing a common reference point and a framework for constructive feedback and dialogue. Scrum Masters/Team Coaches can support the team in creating, reviewing, and updating their working agreements, as well as in holding each other accountable for following them.

In SAFe®, the Coach Sync (also known as the Scrum of Scrums or SM/TC Sync) is a coordination event for Scrum Masters and Team Coaches within an Agile Release Train (ART). The main purpose of this event is to gain visibility into team progress, discuss impediments, and ensure cross-team alignment.

Facilitated by the Release Train Engineer (RTE), the Coach Sync promotes transparency across the ART by allowing Scrum Masters to share information about iteration status, dependencies, and challenges that may affect other teams. It also serves as a forum for escalating ART-level impediments.

From SAFe guidance:

“The Coach Sync provides Scrum Masters and Team Coaches with visibility into progress and dependencies across teams and enables them to coordinate and remove impediments at the ART level.”

Thus, the correct answer is C. To gain visibility into progress, as this captures the event’s primary purpose.

Lean flow is one of the elements of the CALMR approach to DevOps in SAFe. It means applying lean principles and practices to optimize the flow of value from idea to production. Lean flow accelerates delivery by eliminating waste, reducing batch sizes, implementing pull systems, limiting work in process, managing queues, reducing handoffs, and applying cadence and synchronization. Lean flow enables faster feedback, shorter lead times, higher quality, and lower costs.

A key responsibility of the Scrum Master/Team Coach (SM/TC) in SAFe® is to support Iteration Execution. This involves ensuring that the team adheres to Agile principles, manages dependencies, removes impediments, and maintains focus on achieving iteration goals.

The Scrum Master facilitates team events, promotes collaboration, and helps the team continuously improve. They also assist in managing scope and ensuring transparency by tracking progress through iteration burndowns, Kanban boards, or burn-up charts.

From SAFe guidance:

“Scrum Masters support iteration execution, help the team meet iteration goals, and ensure all Scrum events are productive and within their timeboxes.”

Therefore, the correct answer is B. Supporting Iteration Execution, as it encapsulates a central part of the Scrum Master/Team Coach role.

One benefit of having an IP Iteration every PI is that it creates an estimating buffer for meeting PI objectives. PI objectives are a set of SMART goals that align the teams and stakeholders to a common vision and mission for the upcoming Program Increment (PI). They are derived from the business context, priorities, and dependencies, and are agreed upon and committed by the teams during PI Planning1 However, since PI objectives are based on estimates and assumptions, there is always a degree of uncertainty and variability in the delivery process. To account for this, SAFe recommends that teams reserve 10% of their capacity for each PI as an estimating buffer. This buffer is used during the IP Iteration, which is a unique, dedicated iteration that occurs every PI and provides dedicated time for innovation, continuing education, PI Planning, and Inspect and Adapt events2 By having an IP Iteration as an estimating buffer, the teams can improve the predictability and flow of value delivery, as well as reduce the stress and pressure of meeting the PI objectives23 

One Agile development value is customer collaboration over contract negotiation. This value is one of the four core values of the Agile Manifesto, which states: “We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through this work we have come to value: Individuals and interactions over processes and tools Working software over comprehensive documentation Customer collaboration over contract negotiation Responding to change over following a plan That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the left more.” 1 This value emphasizes the importance of building a trusting and collaborative relationship with the customers, rather than relying on rigid and formal contracts that may limit the ability to respond to changing needs and expectations2 Customer collaboration means involving the customers throughout the development process, seeking their feedback, input, and validation, and delivering solutions that meet their requirements and expectations3 Customer collaboration also means respecting the customers’ opinions and perspectives, and resolving any conflicts or issues in a constructive and respectful manner4 Customer collaboration helps the Agile teams to deliver value faster and more effectively, as well as to increase customer satisfaction and loyalty34 

The CALMR approach to DevOps in SAFe® stands for Culture, Automation, Lean Flow, Measurement, and Recovery. It represents the foundational mindset required to achieve continuous delivery and operational excellence.

The “C” in CALMR stands for Culture, which emphasizes building a culture of shared responsibility between development, operations, and business teams. This shared responsibility ensures alignment, collaboration, and a collective focus on delivering value rather than working in silos.

From SAFe guidance:

“DevOps is founded on a culture of shared responsibility for the delivery of value, encouraging collaboration across all roles and reducing handoffs.”

Therefore, the correct answer is B. Create a culture of shared responsibility, as it reflects the first and most essential principle of the CALMR approach.