ZYXS service management currently operates a Change Approval Forum (CAF): which is chaired by the ZYXS Service Management and Service Desk Lead, and is meant to be attended by user representatives from each ZYX company.
-In the new SIAM model ZYX is considering using SIAMRUS as the service integrator
-ZYX plans to keep all current service providers, renegotiating and extending contracts where necessary.
-OUTSCO will continue to provide the services for users in ZYXUK
-ZYXS, ZYXD, and the application development team from ZYXUK will become internal service providers
The SIAMRUS SIAM model includes a process model for change management. In this model. SIAMRUS will hold an Integrated Change Advisory Board (ICAB) meeting every two weeks, where proposed changes to the services and systems will be reviewed before approval SIAMRUS will mandate the use of their change management toolset by all service providers
The CIO is concerned that some of the current service providers may not comply with the SIAMRUS process model for change management
Which organizations are most likely to not comply and why?
ZYX has started the SIAM transition project The project team has recognized that a major factor to success will be managing people through the transition from the current operational model to the future SIAM model. It has been decided to create a dedicated consultation group to formulate the best approach to supporting the staff
Who should best be included in the consultation group?
ZYX has now appointed SIAMRUS as the service integrator and has started to plan and build the new SIAM ecosystem Initially the new SIAM model will be supported by the existing service providers.
In a recent program progress meeting, it was highlighted that the planned Organizational Change Management (OCM) initiative has a high cost
What approach should be taken to ensure that the OCM initiative for the service providers will cost effectively support the transition to SIAM?
The corporate strategy of ZYX contains these objectives:
-Ensure delivery against contracts
-Invest in and tram all ZYX staff
-Reduce operating costs
-Be ready to adapt to change
The ZYX strategy requires that the costs of the service integrator should be as low as possible, and that service levels and high-quality services should be achieved at all times. The CEO wants the new SIAM model to be in place as soon as possible
OUTSCO is a global provider of a range of services, including service integration They have a good reputation as a flexible and reliable service integrator who is willing to amend their SIAM model. They are in the last year of a 10-year contract to provide outsourced services to ZYXUK. Over the last two years the performance and quality of their services has decreased
SIAMRUS is a global provider of service integration services in the manufacturing sector They use a standardized SIAM model with limited flexibility SIAMRUS recently created an outline SIAM strategy for ZYXUK: proposing that they should be the service integrator.
ZYXS is experienced in the service management of corporate services including managing the delivery of service providers The ZYXS IT Director used to be a senior service manager in a small service integration company The ZYXS office location is almost at capacity with no possibility of expansion ZYXS are the developers of NEWBNK, which is strategic to the future of ZYX
The CEO wants to retain as many of the existing service providers as possible
Which is the most appropriate structure and sourcing approach for choosing the service integrator for ZYX?
The planning for NEWGEN has started
-ZYXS will be the service integrator
-OUTSCO will provide application support services
-NETSCO will provide network services.
-PAYSCO is asked to continue to provide payroll services
Users are happy with the services of PAYSCO The contract with PAYSCO has 2 years left to run This is 18 months after the expected completion date ot the implementation of the SIAM model Initial discussions by ZYXS with PAYSCO have indicated that PAYSCO does not want to make any contract changes to support the SIAM model.
Given this constraint what is most likely to be the best method to plan for onboarding PAYSCO?
ZYX have decided to use the external service integrator structure The ZYX CEO wants to minimize risks to service availability. In order to avoid reliance on single service providers the CEO wants to use four different providers for hosting There will be one service provider for hosting for each of the following countries
-the UK
-Germany
-the Netherlands
- Australia
To provide resilience every application used by ZYX will be hosted by three different hosting service providers
The CEO wants to ensure a rapid introduction of new services and service providers She also wants to ensure that the costs for the service integrator are as low as possible The ZYXH legal team does not want to make the drafting of the contracts more difficult than necessary
It is clear that there is a single structure needed for the service integrator contract
Which contract structure is the most appropriate for ZYX?
ZYX has decided to appoint ZYXS as service integrator using the lead supplier structure ZYXS will need to fill new roles with additional skilled resources The contract with OUTSCO will be terminated, and all the component services will be transitioned to FIELD$CO: MAILSCO. NETSCO. ZYXD and ZYXS
The SIAM Project Board has just agreed that after the transition there will no longer be a requirement for service delivery managers in ZYXUK to manage the outsourced contract with OUTSCO
What is the best way to deal with this situation?
The SIAM Project Board has decided that the service integrator will be external. The external service integrator has been charged with establishing the governance framework to monitor and measure performance of the ZYX SIAM ecosystem
What will contribute most to the complexity of the governance framework??
ZYXS has been selected as the service integrator. They will also provide some hosted application services, using ZYXD as a subcontractor. ZYXS will also provide a central service desk for the SIAM ecosystem.
Considering ZYXS, which factor is most critical to the success of SIAM?
ZYX decides to go with SIAMRUS as the service integrator.
The SIAM Project Board has recognized there will be challenges to making the changes required to the attitude and behavior of individuals and the culture of the ZYX companies that are necessary for a successful transition to a SIAM model
What is the best approach that should be taken to ensure success with organizational change management (OCM)?
ZYX has gathered information about their current services. The CEO wants to keep up the momentum in the project by arranging a contract with SIAMRUS to be the external service integrator using their proposed SIAM model.
The CIO wants to investigate alternative service integration offerings and structures., to mitigate possible nsks. The CEO has agreed to this
Considering the ZYX mandate for change and the ZYX corporate strategy, what is the best way to conduct this investigation?
The ZYX Board of Directors is considering which SIAM structure should be selected for the ZYX SIAM model
What is most likely to influence the selection?
ZYX has used a phased approach for implementing the SIAM model
-ZYXS is the service integrator and provides the service desk for the SIAM ecosystem
-NETSCO had all network services transitioned to them
-OUTSCO has been selected to provide hosting services
The next phase is to transition all services currently hosted by ZYXS and ZYXD to OUTSCO Due to time pressures, it has not been possible to test how the services will perform after transition.
The ZYX CEO is concerned about the risks to the services and the ability of ZYX to be able to carry out its business activities She wishes that an early life support (ELS) function is implemented
What approach should be taken to resolve incidents and problems caused by the transition of services?