DP-800 Developing AI-Enabled Database Solutions Questions and Answers

The two correct actions are D and E because the ingestion failures are caused by malformed JSON and duplicate payloads , and these two controls address those two problems directly. Microsoft’s JSON documentation states that SQL Server and Azure SQL support validating JSON with ISJSON , and Microsoft specifically recommends using a CHECK constraint to ensure JSON text stored in a column is properly formatted.

For the duplicate-payload issue, creating a unique index on a hash of the payload is the appropriate design. Microsoft documents using hashing functions such as HASHBYTES to hash column values, and SQL Server allows a deterministic computed column to be used as a key column in a UNIQUE constraint or unique index . That makes a persisted hash-based computed column plus a unique index a practical and exam-consistent way to reject duplicate payloads efficiently.

The other options do not solve the stated root causes:

Snapshot isolation addresses concurrency behavior, not malformed JSON or duplicate payload detection.

A trigger to rewrite malformed JSON is not the right integrity control and is brittle.

Foreign key constraints enforce referential integrity, not JSON validity or duplicate-payload prevention

The best recommendation is to use an MCP server . In the official DP-800 study guide , Microsoft explicitly lists skills such as configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) tool options in a GitHub Copilot session and connecting to MCP server endpoints, including Microsoft SQL Server and Fabric Lakehouse . That makes MCP the exam-aligned mechanism for enabling AI-assisted tools to work with live database context rather than static snapshots.

This also matches the stated development requirement: the team will use Visual Studio Code and GitHub Copilot and needs to retrieve live metadata from the databases . Microsoft’s documentation for GitHub Copilot with the MSSQL extension explains that Copilot works with an active database connection , provides schema-aware suggestions , supports chatting with a connected database, and adapts responses based on the current database context . Microsoft also documents MCP as the standard way for AI tools to connect to external systems and data sources through discoverable tools and endpoints.

The other options do not satisfy the “live metadata” requirement as well:

A .dacpac is a point-in-time schema artifact, not live metadata.

A Copilot instruction file provides guidance, not live database discovery.

Including the database project in the repository helps source control and deployment, but it still does not provide live database metadata by itself.

The first statement is No . The requirement says telemetry data must be stored in a partitioned table to provide predictable performance for ingestion and retention operations. However, the shown CREATE TABLE statement does not define a partition function or partition scheme, and the table is created with a regular clustered primary key on TelemetryId. Microsoft’s partitioning guidance states that creating a partitioned table requires a partition function , a partition scheme , and creating the table or index on that partition scheme using a partitioning column. None of that appears in the code, so the table is not partitioned.

The second statement is Yes . The code creates a JSON index named JI_VehicleTelemetry_Location on LocationJson for these specific JSON paths: $.location.latitude, $.location.longitude, and $.location.accuracy. That matches the requirement that those JSON properties must be filterable by using an index seek . Microsoft documents that JSON indexing is used to optimize filtering and sorting on JSON properties, and the index only helps for the properties included in the index definition.

The third statement is No . The JSON index is defined only for latitude, longitude, and accuracy. A query filtering on $.location.heading references a different path that is not included in the index definition, so that query would not use JI_VehicleTelemetry_Location for that predicate. JSON indexes are path-specific; they do not automatically cover unrelated properties in the same JSON document.

JSON_VALUE(f.FeedbackJson, ' $.text ' ) AS FeedbackText

CONTAINS(FeedbackJson, @Keyword)

SimilarityScore

These three selections are the correct way to complete the query because they align exactly with the stated requirements for the FeedbackJson column.

First, to extract the customer feedback text from the JSON document , the correct expression is JSON_VALUE(f.FeedbackJson, ' $.text ' ) AS FeedbackText . Microsoft documents that JSON_VALUE is used to extract a scalar value from JSON, while JSON_QUERY is used for returning an object or array . Since $.text is the textual feedback string, JSON_VALUE is the correct function.

Second, to filter rows where the JSON text contains a keyword , the best choice is CONTAINS(FeedbackJson, @Keyword) . The scenario explicitly states that FeedbackJson already has a full-text index , and Microsoft documents that CONTAINS is the full-text predicate used in the WHERE clause to search full-text indexed character data. That makes it more appropriate than using EDIT_DISTANCE for keyword filtering.

Third, to order the results by similarity score, highest first , the correct item is SimilarityScore in the ORDER BY clause, which would be paired with DESC in the query. This matches the requirement to sort by the computed fuzzy similarity value. The DP-800 study guide specifically includes writing queries that use fuzzy string matching functions such as EDIT_DISTANCE, which supports the earlier computed SimilarityScore expression in the query.

The best recommendation is B because the slow query filters on FleetId and returns LastUpdatedUtc , EngineStatus , and BatteryHealth . A nonclustered index with FleetId as the key column allows the optimizer to perform an index seek instead of a clustered index scan, and including the other selected columns makes the index covering , which reduces extra lookups and I/O. Microsoft’s SQL Server indexing guidance states that a nonclustered index with included columns can significantly improve performance when all query columns are available in the index, because the optimizer can satisfy the query directly from the index.

The query is:

SELECT VehicleId, LastUpdatedUtc, EngineStatus, BatteryHealth

FROM dbo.VehicleHealthSummary

WHERE FleetId = @FleetId

ORDER BY LastUpdatedUtc DESC;

Among the given choices, FleetId is the most important search argument because it appears in the WHERE predicate. Microsoft’s index design guidance recommends putting columns used for searching in the key and using nonkey included columns to cover the rest of the query efficiently.

Why the other options are weaker:

A is not appropriate because changing the clustered index to LastUpdatedUtc would not target the main filter predicate on FleetId, and a table can have only one clustered index.

C makes LastUpdatedUtc the key, which is poor for a query whose primary filter is FleetId.

D is not the right answer here because the query requirement does not specify only recent rows, and filtered indexes are meant for a well-defined subset; this option also uses a time-based expression that is not aligned to the stated query pattern.

Strictly speaking, the most optimal design for both filtering and ordering would usually be a composite key like (FleetId, LastUpdatedUtc), but since that is not one of the available options, B is the correct exam answer.

where exists 2. where p.PatientID = pr.PatientID Otherwise we filter PatientID twice. Having in the subquery does not work without group by and the date filter does not work without where.

Azure Functions’ Azure SQL trigger requires change tracking to be enabled on the source table. Microsoft’s SQL trigger documentation states that setting up change tracking for the Azure SQL trigger requires two steps : enable change tracking on the database and enable change tracking on the table being monitored. Since the question asks specifically which database configurations you should perform, enabling change tracking on dbo.Employee is one of the required database-side steps.

To meet the latency requirement that changes trigger the function within five seconds , the relevant trigger setting is Sql_Trigger_PollingIntervalMs . Microsoft documents this setting as the delay, in milliseconds, between processing each batch of changes, and a value of 5000 means the trigger polls every 5 seconds .

A few clarifications about the other options:

B is not the documented setting name. The documented app setting is Sql_Trigger_BatchSize or host setting MaxBatchSize , not “SetSql Trigger MaxBatchSize”. The screenshot wording suggests a distractor.

D is also required in practice for the trigger to work, but the question asks for two answers and includes the polling setting plus the table-level CT setting as the actionable choices presented.

F is wrong because the Azure SQL trigger uses change tracking , not CDC.

The requirement is to ensure embeddings are updated every time the underlying content changes without relying on a nightly batch job. The right design is to enable change tracking on the source table so an external process can identify which rows changed and regenerate embeddings only for those rows. Microsoft documents that change detection mechanisms are used to pick up new and updated rows incrementally , which is the right pattern when you need near-continuous refresh instead of full nightly rebuilds.

This is better than:

A. fixed-size chunking , which affects chunk strategy but not change detection.

B. a smaller embedding model , which affects model cost/latency but not update triggering.

C. table triggers , which would push embedding-maintenance logic directly into write operations and is generally not the best design for AI-processing pipelines. The question specifically asks for a solution that replaces the nightly batch requirement, not one that performs heavyweight work inline during every transaction.

This does meet the goal. Microsoft documents that SDK-style SQL projects can add the master.dacpac database reference as a package reference , and for Azure SQL Database the correct package is the Azure-specific master DACPAC package. The Azure SQL system DACPACs are available through NuGet, and this is the recommended way to include the right system objects in the database model for dotnet build validation.

So for an SDK-style SQL database project that targets Azure SQL Database, adding Microsoft.SqlServer.Dacpacs.Azure.Master is the correct fix for unresolved references to system objects.

The correct answer is B because Data API builder exposes REST entities by default using the URL pattern:

https://{base_url}/api/{entity}

Microsoft’s current DAB documentation states exactly that the default REST endpoint pattern is /api/{entity} . For an entity named Todo , the REST route is therefore /api/Todo .

The other options are incorrect:

A uses a GraphQL-style route and is not the REST endpoint.

C uses /data-api/Todo , which is not the default REST path for a directly hosted DAB runtime.

D adds an unnecessary /data-api prefix before /api/Todo .

Microsoft also shows examples such as:

GET https://localhost:5001/api/book

and documents collection reads as:

GET /api/{entity} .

So for the entity configuration:

Entity name: Todo

Source: dbo.todos

the REST endpoint path is:

/api/Todo

Therefore, among the supplied choices, Option B is the correct answer.

The correct function is VECTOR_SEARCH because the requirement is to perform approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) queries. Microsoft’s SQL documentation states that VECTOR_SEARCH is the function used for vector similarity search, and that an ANN index is used only with VECTOR_SEARCH when a compatible vector index exists on the target column. By contrast, VECTOR_DISTANCE calculates an exact distance and does not use a vector index for ANN retrieval.

The correct distance metric is cosine distance. Microsoft documents that VECTOR_SEARCH supports cosine, dot, and euclidean metrics, and Microsoft guidance specifically notes that cosine similarity is commonly used for text embeddings. It also states that retrieval of the most similar texts to a given text typically functions better with cosine similarity, and that Azure OpenAI embeddings rely on cosine similarity to compute similarity between a query and documents. Since both NotesEmbeddings and DescriptionEmbeddings are text-derived embeddings and the goal is to minimize the impact of different chunk sizes, cosine is the best choice because it compares direction/angle rather than being as sensitive to vector magnitude as Euclidean distance.

For an Azure App Service using a user-assigned managed identity to connect to Azure SQL Database with Microsoft Entra authentication , the required database-side step is to create a database user from the external provider , then grant the needed database roles. Microsoft’s Azure SQL documentation for managed identities states that to let a managed identity access the target database, you create a SQL user for that identity by using:

CREATE USER [ < identity-name > ] FROM EXTERNAL PROVIDER;

and then assign the appropriate roles.

That makes db_datareader and db_datawriter the right role grants here, because the requirement says the identity must have read and write permissions to SalesDB.

The other options are incorrect:

A uses CREATE LOGIN ... FROM EXTERNAL PROVIDER, which is not the right choice for this Azure SQL Database scenario; the documented pattern is to create a database user from the external provider.

B and D create SQL-authentication principals with passwords, which does not meet the Microsoft Entra managed-identity requirement.

D also grants sysadmin, which is a server-level overgrant and not appropriate for the stated read/write requirement.

The scenario says Query Store already shows two persisted execution plans for the same query, and the older plan performed much better than the newer one during the last hour. Microsoft documents that sp_query_store_force_plan is used to force a particular plan for a particular query in Query Store . That makes it the fastest way to restore the previously good plan without changing application code , which is exactly what the question requires.

Why the other options are not the best fit:

sp_query_store_set_hints is for adding or updating Query Store hints to influence compilation behavior, but when you already know the exact older good plan, Microsoft points to plan forcing as the direct remedy.

DBCC FREEPROCCACHE clears cached plans broadly and is disruptive; it does not guarantee a return to the known good plan.

ALTER DATABASE is too general and does not directly restore the prior execution plan.

So the right Transact-SQL command is:

EXEC sp_query_store_force_plan

using the relevant @query_id and @plan_id from Query Store for the older, better-performing plan. Microsoft also notes that when a plan is forced, SQL Server tries to use that plan whenever it encounters the query again.